Teams

Pickney/3.5MXD/18's/CG/Sli

2025 Slidell Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5 Slidell (18&O) Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-07vs Baker/3.5MXD/18's/CG/SLILost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy McGhee / Stan Elmore vs Rhonda Lacoste / Hop Duong3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobin Pickney / Scott Buras vs Karen Laurant / Mark Javery3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRhonda Armond / Richard Armond vs Cassie Baker / Brian Baker6-2, 6-2
2025-07-31vs Baker/3.5MXD/18's/CG/SLILost 12
L#1 DoublesStan Elmore / Amy McGhee vs Karen Laurant / Mark Javery6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRhonda Armond / Richard Armond vs Hop Duong / Rhonda Lacoste6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Frick / Robin Pickney vs Cassie Baker / Brian Baker6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-31vs Baker/3.5MXD/18's/CG/SLILost 12
L#1 DoublesRhonda Armond / Richard Armond vs Rhonda Lacoste / Hop Duong2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy McGhee / Stan Elmore vs Cassie Baker / Brian Baker6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobin Pickney / Scott Buras vs Karen Laurant / Mark Javery3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Slidell (18&O) Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Amy McGhee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Aaron Frick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Richard Armond
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Scott Buras
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Rhonda Armond
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Stan Elmore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Robin Pickney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stan Elmore + Amy McGhee123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Armond + Rhonda Armond123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy McGhee
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Aaron Frick
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Richard Armond
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Scott Buras
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Rhonda Armond
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Stan Elmore
15W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Robin Pickney
16W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.