Teams

OVP/Johnston-McKinney

2025 COTA USTA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women - Fall '24 · 3.5 Weekday Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Lindsay Peters
published
3.31
Joy Segars
published
3.20
Mary Gray
published
3.20
Susan McKinney
published
3.17
Kelli Powell
published
3.12
Shelley Hulland
published
3.06
Jill Haynes
published
3.05
Chinami Goodie
published 3.5
2.96
Sara Shue
published
2.91
Karen McCall
published
2.65
Sheila Hodge
published
2.60
Gail Smith
published
2.55
Jen Cole
published
2.51
Beth Saye
published 3
Lauren Ghesquiere
published
Nancy Crew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Haynes + Lindsay Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Karen McCall + Joy Segars213 matchesnot enough data
Karen McCall + Sheila Hodge033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Peters
48W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Joy Segars
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Mary Gray
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Susan McKinney
30W–36L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelli Powell
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelley Hulland
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jill Haynes
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Chinami Goodie
12W–20L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Sara Shue
22W–10L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Karen McCall
21W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
Sheila Hodge
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Gail Smith
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Jen Cole
23W–28L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Beth Saye
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Lauren Ghesquiere
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Crew
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.