Teams

GR-Colie (18s 3.0 MX)

Neuse River Mixed Doubles 18 & over · 3.0 Mixed Doubles

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-29vs RB-Dempsey/Dawson (18s 3.0 MX)Won 21
W#1 DoublesGreg Baggett / Jennie Baggett vs Mary-Marshall Greene / Daniel Moore4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCrystal Dawson / Thomas Dawson vs Lakisha Dawson / James Vislocky0-6
W#3 DoublesCathy Williams / Terry Dawson vs Mike Bowman / Shumena Horton6-4, 6-3
2025-07-19vs RB-Dempsey/Dawson (18s 3.0 MX)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Dawson / Megan Pender vs James Vislocky / Martha Whitesides5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Williams / Mark Wuntke vs Keela Blango / Daniel Moore2-6, 0-6
2025-06-23vs RB-Dempsey/Dawson (18s 3.0 MX)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Pender / Greg Baggett vs Lakisha Dawson / Daniel Moore5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCrystal Dawson / Thomas Dawson vs Shumena Horton / Dylan Edwards6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGeneva Colie / Terry Dawson vs Jenny Dempsey / Mike Bowman3-6, 4-6
2025-06-07vs RB-Dempsey/Dawson (18s 3.0 MX)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCrystal Dawson / Thomas Dawson vs Dylan Edwards / Lakisha Dawson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Pender / Mark Wuntke vs Mike Bowman / Keela Blango3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Greg Baggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Terry Dawson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Jennie Baggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Mark Wuntke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Megan Pender
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Crystal Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.06
Geneva Colie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Seymour
published
Thomas Dawson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Wuntke + Geneva Colie044 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Baggett + Greg Baggett314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wuntke + Crystal Dawson033 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Dawson + Crystal Dawson213 matchesnot enough data
Terry Dawson + Megan Pender033 matchesnot enough data
Megan Pender + Greg Baggett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Baggett
18W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Terry Dawson
7W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jennie Baggett
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
Mark Wuntke
8W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Megan Pender
29W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%69%31%
2.43
2.5
Crystal Dawson
19W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25
Geneva Colie
15W–66L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Frank Seymour
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Dawson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.