Teams

Bingo Bango

2023 Ekolu League · 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-10-01vs Double WhammyWon 10
W#1 Mixed DoublesNicholas Tran / Gwen Tanaka vs Dean Takebayashi / Niko Gagne6-0, 6-3
2023-09-25vs Mixed PlateWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Gwen Tanaka vs Myra Hironaga / Noriko Kobayashi6-1, 6-2
2023-09-03vs Double ShotsLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Jenna Honda vs Savery Kann / Britta Zimmer-Long3-6, 1-6
2023-08-12vs Mixed PlateWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMarissa Hayashi / Midori Matsuo vs Reiko Bando / Jun Ishimine6-2, 7-6
W#1 Mixed DoublesKuakini Baltero / Gwen Tanaka vs Myra Hironaga / Brian Michael Higa6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bingo Bango53131123192
2Mixed Plate35111327229
3Double Whammy0851941274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Marissa Hayashi
usually #1 Female Doubles 71%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 29% · published 4
3.88
Hanha Youn
published
3.56
Satoshi Tanaka
published
3.39
Tomoko Sakishima
published
3.33
Krislyn Hara
published
Bryce Harada
published 3.5
3.20
Gwen Tanaka
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Lance Sewake
published
3.15
Nixon Jack
published
3.13
Kip Nagata
published
2.93
Midori Matsuo
published
2.51
Jenna Honda
published
Kendra Hara
published
Kuakini Baltero
published
Lisa Lei Ishikawa
published
Nicholas Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tomoko Sakishima + Midori Matsuo4353% games+3.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marissa Hayashi
110W–54L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.94
Hanha Youn
45W–21L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.88
Satoshi Tanaka
44W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.56
Tomoko Sakishima
67W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
Krislyn Hara
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Bryce Harada
10W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gwen Tanaka
88W–51L career · 9 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Lance Sewake
31W–23L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Nixon Jack
24W–24L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Kip Nagata
48W–33L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Midori Matsuo
32W–12L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
2.93
Jenna Honda
9W–39L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Kendra Hara
12W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kuakini Baltero
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Lei Ishikawa
51W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nicholas Tran
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.