Teams

Love is for Losers

Spring Adult 18 & Over Lone Star (Non-Adv) · Lonestar Ladies 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs SweetShotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Hausman / Jennifer Ortegon vs Monique Zint / Jennifer Featherstone1-8
L#2 DoublesCathy Garza / Kim Horkavy vs DeeDee Green / Catherine Torres1-8
L#3 DoublesJaviera Pierattini / Shari Hanrahan vs Gina Budd / Kathy Sonnier2-8
2026-03-22vs Queens of the CourtLost 03
L#1 DoublesChing Synn Teo / Cathy Garza vs Elizabeth Hadley / Prerna Daga1-8
L#2 DoublesKim Horkavy / Yesica Sobremonte vs Molly Lochridge / Laura Steblay3-8
L#3 DoublesJaviera Pierattini / Shari Hanrahan vs Lizi Li / Shelby Shafferman1-8
2026-03-21vs Tough LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesChing Synn Teo / Jennifer Ortegon vs Harlan Ross / Jyoti MacHen4-8
L#2 DoublesKristen Hausman / Javiera Pierattini vs Christina Furtado / Steph Steele0-8
L#3 DoublesKim Horkavy / Yesica Sobremonte vs Emily Russell / Joanne Utay0-8
2026-03-21vs TNTLost 03
L#1 DoublesYesica Sobremonte / Ching Synn Teo vs Kristin Kercheville / Courtney Comstock2-8
L#2 DoublesCathy Garza / Kristen Hausman vs Rhonda Silguero / Harmony Adams0-8
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ortegon / Shari Hanrahan vs Melissa Francis / Nedra Gartica5-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lonestar Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.02
Jennifer Ortegon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.91
Ching Synn Teo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.88
Shari Hanrahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.78
Yesica Sobremonte
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.76
Javiera Pierattini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.74
Kim Horkavy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
1.70
Kristen Hausman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Daniel Rodriguez
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Ortegon
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Ching Synn Teo
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Shari Hanrahan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Yesica Sobremonte
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Javiera Pierattini
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
Kim Horkavy
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Kristen Hausman
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.70
Daniel Rodriguez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.