Teams

Mission Oaks Dragons

2026 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · Ventura - Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wood Ranch Hitmen000000
2Pierpont Pelicans000000
3Chief Peak000000
4Mission Oaks Firecrackers000000
5North Ranch Renegades000000
6Sunset Hills000000
7Mission Oaks Dragons000000
8Dream Team Fall - LPCC/SHCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Alireza Rezaie
published 4
4.00
Yusaku Taguchi
published
3.94
Mark Hammond
published
3.83
Alan Tran
published 4
3.67
Thai Takeuchi
published
3.59
Donald Matthews
published
3.56
Frank Swanson
published
3.55
Vikas Dogra
published
3.54
Xiaodong Shen
published
3.40
Brian Colon
published 3.5
3.28
Longbin Liu
published
3.25
Andre Bati
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andre Bati + Longbin Liu4746% games−15.9% vs expected
Frank Swanson + Xiaodong Shen1435% gamesnot enough data
Alan Tran + Vikas Dogra123 matchesnot enough data
Brian Colon + Andre Bati123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alireza Rezaie
16W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
Yusaku Taguchi
5W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Mark Hammond
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Alan Tran
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Thai Takeuchi
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Donald Matthews
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Frank Swanson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
Vikas Dogra
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Xiaodong Shen
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Brian Colon
13W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
Longbin Liu
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Andre Bati
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.