Teams

LLAS UPTA55A/Weiner

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-18vs HHTL55/Lieberman/SPCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTimothy Stewart / John Jennings vs Peter Kolaric / Al Cannon1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBelton Thomason / Andrew Weiner vs Shawn Oliver / Gabriel Fornari1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarney Pannell / Lee Chapman vs Daniel Lieberman / James Demos2-6, 2-6
2025-05-18vs CTL55/EAKER/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Jennings / Timothy Stewart vs Joseph Stricklin / Scott Swanson7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBelton Thomason / Lee Chapman vs Gerald Sitton / Christopher Eaker6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Weiner / Christopher Chase vs Shawn Burke / Jeffrey Hook6-4, 7-6
2025-05-17vs LCTA55/McKay/Wild DunesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrew Weiner / John Jennings vs Ronald Goodwin / George Jarck6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLee Chapman / Christopher Chase vs Shawn Holland / Rhett Hancock5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDouglas Meagher / Barney Pannell vs Bo Crouch / Frank Larkin1-6, 1-6
2025-05-17vs BBTL55/Stone/DatawLost 12
L#1 DoublesLee Chapman / Andrew Weiner vs Allan Robinson / Bill Higgs3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Jennings / Timothy Stewart vs Todd Stone / Kevin McGuire6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarney Pannell / Christopher Chase vs David Holland / Brent Borchert3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Andy Steingold
published 4.5
Chase Kasper
published 4.5
Christopher Chase
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Belton Thomason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.76
Douglas Meagher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Lee Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Timothy Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Barney Pannell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Jeffrey Wolf
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Wolf + Barney Pannell4257% games+12.6% vs expected
Barney Pannell + Lee Chapman3355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Weiner
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Andy Steingold
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Chase Kasper
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Chase
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Belton Thomason
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Douglas Meagher
30W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
Lee Chapman
22W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Timothy Stewart
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.73
4
Barney Pannell
27W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.70
Jeffrey Wolf
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.