Teams

MHolt-HS

2026 Eno River Adult 55 & Over · 55 Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2026-04-28vs RKern-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMike Kempel / David Naden vs Mike Ederle / Donald Emmett6-1, 6-1
2026-04-23vs RGildehaus-YMCALost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Ralph Russo vs Ed Holub / David Holub0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Stefan / Mark Macdonald vs Derek Saccoccio / James White3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Holt / Scott Hartman vs Greg Fitts / Scott Jolly6-7, 2-6
2026-04-16vs NBuckley-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesPhilip Sweigart / Valdis Stiebris vs Tim McMahon / John Lockhead7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Michael Holt vs Richard Bolduc / Gregory Schulwitz6-4, 7-5
2026-04-09vs SClark-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Macdonald / David Stefan vs Andy Holloman / Lou Hensley7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Hartman / Michael Holt vs Colin Hayward / Jeff Huxtable6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRalph Russo / Mike Kempel vs Carl Laird / Dan Robinson6-7, 3-6
2026-04-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Denhard / Mike Kempel vs Mark Bland / Bill Stewart6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-04-02vs RKern-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Holt / Philip Sweigart vs Robert Kern / Richard Goldberg6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRalph Russo / Mike Kempel vs Donald Emmett / Kwok-Wai Tsang6-0, 6-0
2026-03-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Kempel / Jeff Denhard vs Rick Edmunds / Robert Long6-3, 6-1
2026-03-26vs GGlish55-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Griffin / Ralph Russo vs Timothy Buckley / Adam Strom0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Mark Macdonald vs Dan Tudor / Doug Kopec3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Stefan / Scott Hartman vs Mark Higuchi / Roberto Gomperts3-6, 6-7
2026-03-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMike Kempel / Darrell Bradfield vs Jeff Biersach / Tom Porter6-0, 7-5
2026-03-23vs NBuckley-HRWon 21
W#1 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Richard Griffin vs Tom Fiore / Lance Long6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Hartman / Mike Kempel vs Niall Buckley / Jeffrey Qualls3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRalph Russo / Stephen Rothchild vs Richard Bolduc / Greg Duncan6-2, 6-4
2026-03-19vs RGildehaus-YMCASplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhilip Sweigart / Valdis Stiebris vs Darren DeWalt / Derek Saccoccio6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMike Kempel / Mark Macdonald vs James White / Ralph Gildehaus0-6, 3-6
2026-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesMike Kempel / David Nagelhout vs Charles Fisher / Gordon Albro6-0, 6-0
2026-03-05vs SClark-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhilip Sweigart / Richard Griffin vs Todd Bachman / Bert Clancey6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephen Rothchild / Valdis Stiebris vs Glen Hacker / Andy Holloman1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJAMES MONTAGUE / Scott Hartman vs Carl Laird / Chun Lav4-6, 5-7
2026-03-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMike Kempel / Mike Liller vs Jeff Biersach / Tom Wollman6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 55 Over Adult 3.5 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GGlish55-CHTC7119512170
2MHolt-HS44121224210
3SClark-DUR44101432251
4NBuckley-HR2681633236
5RKern-CHTC0842041258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Philip Sweigart
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.46
Michael Holt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Mike Kempel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.27
Stephen Rothchild
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Ralph Russo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Mark Macdonald
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.13
David Stefan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Scott Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Valdis Stiebris
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ralph Russo + Mike Kempel314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Sweigart + Stephen Rothchild123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Philip Sweigart
63W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.57
Michael Holt
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Mike Kempel
27W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.33
3.5
Stephen Rothchild
62W–60L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Ralph Russo
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Mark Macdonald
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
David Stefan
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Scott Hartman
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.