Teams

River Birch

Coastal Plains USTA Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-04vs BW World Rascals 4.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesAlberto Gonzales vs Yuriy Kermoshchuk6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKrishna Tiwari vs Jay Wilkins6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesThomas Albanese vs Igor Arshava4-6, 3-6
2026-07-14vs BW World Rascals 4.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesThomas Albanese vs Stuart Whitehead0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlberto Gonzales vs Jay Wilkins6-0, 6-1
L#3 SinglesBrent Portz vs Igor Arshava3-6, 4-6
2026-06-09vs BW World Rascals 4.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMark Gerhart vs Stuart Whitehead6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesThomas Albanese vs Yuriy Kermoshchuk5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesKrishna Tiwari vs Jeremy Le6-2, 6-2
2026-06-02vs GR - HaislipLost 12
L#1 SinglesMark Gerhart vs Robert Jones6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJustin Freund vs Jeremiah Montgomery5-7, 6-7
W#3 SinglesThomas Albanese vs Brandon Sutton6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BW World Rascals 4.05112614134
2River Birch13571599
3GR - Haislip134818131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Mark Gerhart
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.39
Alberto Gonzales
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Brent Portz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Albanese
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Justin Freund
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Krishna Tiwari
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Gerhart
27W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Alberto Gonzales
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Brent Portz
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
Thomas Albanese
7W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.08
Justin Freund
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Krishna Tiwari
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.