Teams

NR CANTERBURY

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Fall-Weeknight 18&over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-18vs Zimmer Fall 24 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Phillips / Kelsey Rush vs Stephanie Kirkland / Amanda Arnold1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKelli Kitchens / Helen Lovell vs Allison Anderson / Olivia Outlaw2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAddie Akins / Mallory Booth vs Debra Burroughs / Amy Taylor7-5, 6-4
2024-10-28vs Zimmer Fall 24 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAddie Akins / Morgan Smyth vs Lynn Zimmer / Taylor Baggett6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesInes de Urtubey vs Erin Moore7-5, 1-4
L#2 DoublesKelli Kitchens / Linda Canterbury vs Pamela Welbourne / Allison Anderson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Phillips / Mallory Booth vs Debra Burroughs / Amy Taylor4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Ines de Urtubey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.48
Addie Akins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Alison Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.43
Linda Canterbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Pasquale Tosyali
published
1.94
Lindsey White
published
Helen Lovell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kacie Spruill
published
Kelli Kitchens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Rush
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mallory Booth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Morgan Smyth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Addie Akins + Linda Canterbury213 matchesnot enough data
Alison Phillips + Pasquale Tosyali213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ines de Urtubey
27W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Addie Akins
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Alison Phillips
18W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Linda Canterbury
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%70%30%
2.43
Pasquale Tosyali
19W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.41
Lindsey White
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Helen Lovell
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kacie Spruill
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelli Kitchens
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Rush
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mallory Booth
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Morgan Smyth
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.