Teams

SGV Flint Racketeers-Hegelund-Flint Cyn/SA4

2024 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Susan Lee vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Ashley Rubio6-2
2024-06-15vs SGV CA Rollers- Shimizu-WN/SULost 12
W#1 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs Miki Makiko Shimizu / Claire Gibbs6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Christine Russell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandy Robinson / Caprina Auyong vs Debbie Carmody / Rosemary Lee4-6, 2-6
2024-06-08vs SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA4Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Helle Hegelund vs Ming-Ming Peng / Theresa Sterling4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Pashayan vs Jenny Lin3-6, 2-6
2024-06-01vs SGV TCC-Neal-Claremont Club/SU9Won 21
W#1 DoublesAyuko Siegel / Esther Hwang vs Kerri Munson / Charlotte Pereira Reisch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSandy Mandel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKris Gruaz / Nancy Pashayan vs Grace Eleyae / Tracy DuPrez5-7, 4-6
W#1 DoublesLinda Kroff / Pamela Rosenberg vs Mindy Schiffman / Felicia Yu7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Cristina Padron2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAntoinette Lessuk / Ruth McNulty vs LINH LEE / Jenniffer Wong6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Abbey Everson0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNancy Pashayan vs VICKY TRINH1-6, 0-6
2024-05-04vs SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SASplit 11
W#2 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Antoinette Lessuk vs Sandra Zane / Christina Kim6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Shannon Koeppen5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Mandel vs Sean Ky0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Kroff / Pamela Rosenberg vs Nancy Wong-Thomas / Audrey Thomas3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHelle Hegelund / Ayuko Siegel vs Jing Feng / Francesca Gill6-1, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCaprina Auyong / Sandy Robinson vs Arianna Favela / Ariana Garcia6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAyuko Siegel / Pat Guttormsen vs Kathy Ochoa / Corinda Hayes6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNancy Pashayan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Esther Hwang
published
3.31
Nancy Pashayan
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Feiming Morgan
published
3.24
Antoinette Lessuk
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Sandy Robinson
published
3.17
Ayuko Siegel
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ruth McNulty
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Sandy Mandel
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Helle Hegelund
published
3.12
Pamela Rosenberg
published
3.07
Kris Gruaz
published
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
3.05
Pamela Girard
published
3.05
Caprina Auyong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Alison Shore
published 3.5
2.99
Linda Kroff
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.98
Gail Gerbode
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helle Hegelund + Antoinette Lessuk2746% games−5.3% vs expected
Linda Kroff + Pamela Rosenberg3443% games−6.5% vs expected
Antoinette Lessuk + Ruth McNulty5752% gamesnot enough data
Caprina Auyong + Ayuko Siegel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
3.5
Nancy Pashayan
61W–74L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Feiming Morgan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Antoinette Lessuk
164W–156L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.24
Sandy Robinson
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Ayuko Siegel
64W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Ruth McNulty
67W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Sandy Mandel
70W–85L career · 9 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.14
Helle Hegelund
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
Pamela Rosenberg
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kris Gruaz
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Pamela Girard
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Caprina Auyong
86W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
3.5
Alison Shore
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Linda Kroff
48W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
2.99
Gail Gerbode
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.