Teams

Apollo - Mazarick

2024 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 40 & over · 3.0 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-02vs Peterson - MazarickWon 30
W#1 SinglesYuko Resseguie vs Sarah Hallock6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLauren Blashford vs Yvonne Rouse6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Jacqui Cannon6-0, 6-1
2024-07-28vs Peterson - MazarickWon 30
W#1 SinglesLinda Caesar vs Betty Peterson6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLauren Blashford vs Denise Bauer Frazier6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Lisa Long6-0, 6-1
2024-07-21vs Peterson - MazarickWon 21
L#1 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Kathy Fick4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Blashford vs Betty Peterson6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesLinda Caesar vs Sandra Martin6-1, 6-1
2024-07-19vs Peterson - MazarickWon 30
W#1 SinglesYuko Resseguie vs Theresa Jones6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Denise Bauer Frazier6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEricka Zumwalt vs Jacqui Cannon6-2, 6-0
2024-07-07vs Peterson - MazarickWon 30
W#1 SinglesLauren Blashford vs Kathy Fick6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Yvonne Rouse6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesLinda Caesar vs Sandra Martin6-0, 6-2
2024-06-30Won 30
W#1 SinglesYuko Resseguie vs Theresa Jones6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLydia Apollo vs Betty Peterson6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesHeather Sisk vs Lisa Long6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Yuko Resseguie
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Ericka Zumwalt
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.92
Lauren Blashford
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Lydia Apollo
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Linda Caesar
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Heather Sisk
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
LaJune Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Blashford + Ericka Zumwalt6451% games−2.5% vs expected
Lauren Blashford + Lydia Apollo14557% games−2.5% vs expected
Ericka Zumwalt + Yuko Resseguie4853% gamesnot enough data
Heather Sisk + Lydia Apollo5555% gamesnot enough data
Ericka Zumwalt + Lydia Apollo3551% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Blashford + Linda Caesar4354% gamesnot enough data
Lydia Apollo + Yuko Resseguie4356% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Blashford + Yuko Resseguie2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Yuko Resseguie
128W–134L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3
Ericka Zumwalt
94W–73L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Lauren Blashford
106W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Lydia Apollo
71W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Linda Caesar
38W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Heather Sisk
51W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
2.68
LaJune Ray
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.