Teams

Team 1 Does and Bros

2021 NOVA Mixed 40 & Over · NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-06-20vs Team 3 Double the FunSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMiyako Pastor / Edward Naidich vs Jeff Abrahamson / Andrea Henningsen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAdheer Bahulkar / Janice Zima vs John Suh / Patrina Clark6-2, 6-0
2021-06-15vs Team 2 Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiyako Pastor / Edward Naidich vs Nathan Bergman / Stephanie Wright3-6, 3-6
2021-05-22vs Team 3 Double the FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanice Zima / Brian Willard vs Andrea Henningsen / James Shevlin2-6, 1-6
2021-05-15vs Team 2 Dare DoublesWon 10
W#1 DoublesMiyako Pastor / Edward Naidich vs Don Kim / Stephanie Wright6-2, 6-3
2021-05-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanice Zima / Brian Willard vs Michelle O'Brien / Richard Aaronson3-6, 1-6
2021-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesMiyako Pastor / Edward Naidich vs Chaitanya Dahagam / Jigisha Dahagam6-2, 6-4
2021-05-02vs Team 2 Dare DoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGary Lawson / Janice Zima vs Stephen Dupuy / Nazarina Phommachanh2-6, 4-6
2021-04-24vs Team 4 CoPlayLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanice Zima / Brian Willard vs Lyn Reid / Paul Reid0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Grace Kim
published 3.5
2.98
Miyako Pastor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Edward Naidich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Anna Monaghan
published 3
2.85
Janice Zima
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.80
Nancy Perkins
published
Fllory Correa
published 3
Yong Jae Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miyako Pastor + Edward Naidich282853% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Grace Kim
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Miyako Pastor
192W–154L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
2.98
3
Edward Naidich
83W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Anna Monaghan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Janice Zima
231W–194L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
Nancy Perkins
132W–95L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Fllory Correa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Yong Jae Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.