← Teams

LOTC-Shull/Mohr

2024 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 4.04 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Lorne Bulling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.08
Shannon Babcock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.89
Charles Taguet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.82
Halle Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.70
Justin Shull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Alex Rand
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Sean Wei
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Atif Afzal
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Mohr
published 4
3.60
Eddie Shin
published 4
3.50
Anita Rockwell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Vivian Nguyen
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Archana Ravi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-12-03Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJason Qian / Shannon Babcock vs Ariana White / Matt Simmering4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSean Wei / Cassia Carpio vs Leo Keppinger / Danielle Cuenco7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesArchana Ravi / Lorne Bulling vs Steve Vanderploeg / Emily Vander Ploeg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesCharles Taguet / Vivian Nguyen vs Ron Press / Mary Bullard7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJason Qian / Shannon Babcock vs Brandon Shell / Melissa Light6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSean Wei / Halle Jackson vs Doug Matheson / Celene Robert6-1, 6-1
2023-11-18Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesAlex Rand / Halle Jackson vs Adina Talpos / Rudd McGarity6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLorne Bulling / Anita Rockwell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSean Wei / Halle Jackson vs Suzie Glenn / Matt Fleskes6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJustin Shull / Archana Ravi vs Randy Laylo / Gabriela Ghita6-3, 6-4
2023-11-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesAtif Afzal / Rachel Karlin vs Mary Klinger / Leo Keppinger6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSean Wei / Cassia Carpio vs Amy Graham / Ernesto Rodriguez6-4, 6-3
2023-10-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesAlex Rand / Kelly Mohr vs Tina Clancy / William Haynes3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVivian Nguyen / Charles Taguet vs Molly Shum / Mitchell Whitehurst4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Steven Nguyen vs Jeanette Thomas / Christian Casebeer6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAtif Afzal / Rachel Karlin vs Greg Bell / Claire Bell6-2, 6-0
2023-10-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJustin Shull / Anita Rockwell vs Edmund Yuan / Ashley Schneider6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Lorne Bulling
24W–6L career
not enough data
—
4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Shannon Babcock
36W–48L career
8%92%0%
4.08
4.5
Charles Taguet
104W–63L career
41%59%0%
3.89
4
Halle Jackson
123W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.82
4
Justin Shull
136W–38L career
2%98%0%
3.70
4
Alex Rand
56W–41L career
6%94%0%
3.64
4
Sean Wei
30W–16L career
19%79%2%
3.63
4
Atif Afzal
52W–36L career
12%88%0%
3.63
4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
4
Eddie Shin
44W–16L career
14%86%0%
3.60
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%80%20%
3.50
3.5
Vivian Nguyen
178W–99L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Archana Ravi
27W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.