Teams

Duval/Hamel - 2nd place (Eagle Harbor)

2022 Duval Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-02vs Duval/Muehl - 1stSplit 11
L#2 DoublesWalter Rios / Jaye Andone vs Donna Marceau / John Francis Raftery4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Hutto / Sheryl Phillips vs Joyce Tabor / Tim Davis6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-15vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#1 DoublesDan Singleton / Jaye Andone vs Joseph Travers / Audi Cathcart6-2, 6-1
2022-09-14vs Duval/Muehl - 1stWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatt Hutto / Jaye Andone vs Dennis Lamoureux / Joyce Tabor6-4, 3-6
2022-09-07vs Duval/Muehl - 1stWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Hutto / Kandee Townsend vs Eugene Kasper / Kathleen Pinho6-4, 6-4
2022-08-25vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy Wentz / Matt Hutto vs Audi Cathcart / Felix Nazareno6-4, 6-2
2022-08-04vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#2 DoublesLarry Townsend / Jaye Andone vs Robert Glasgow / Jennifer Williams6-0, 6-1
2022-07-28vs Duval/Muehl - 1stLost 02
L#2 DoublesLarry Townsend / Jaye Andone vs Arlene Muehl / Kenneth Wood2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDan Singleton / Debra Sutton vs Luca Palombi / Stephanie Carr6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2022-07-18vs WIlliams Y - GlasgowWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Hutto / Kandee Townsend vs Audi Cathcart / Bill Stone6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Thomas Keller
published
3.77
Matt Hutto
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.69
Dan Singleton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Jaye Andone
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.57
Walter Rios
published
3.52
Larry Townsend
published
3.29
Kandee Townsend
published
3.25
David Phillips
published 3.5
Debra Sutton
published 3.5
3.22
Nancy Wentz
published
3.15
Jolene Hamel
published
Sharon Cavins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Singleton + Jaye Andone213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thomas Keller
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Matt Hutto
96W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Dan Singleton
136W–103L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Jaye Andone
41W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Walter Rios
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Larry Townsend
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Kandee Townsend
16W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
David Phillips
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Debra Sutton
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Wentz
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
Jolene Hamel
15W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Sharon Cavins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.