Teams

Carter/Rogers/KTC

2025 Combo 40 & Over 5.5, 7.5 · 7.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-28vs Cantey/Bentonville/KTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMatthew Best / Max Garcia vs Hershel Blevins / Andy Watkins6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Carter / Mark Hendricks vs Paul Hurley / Nick Infante4-6, 1-6
2025-10-27vs Cantey/Bentonville/KTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMax Garcia / Vijay Manoharan vs Paul Hurley / Austin Murray3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Lasater / Blake Jones vs Jason Cantey / Thang Vu6-4, 6-2
2025-10-06vs Heien-Cooper/Fayetteville/SRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesVijay Manoharan / Max Garcia vs Harrison Heien / Charles Bruce7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMax Bachman / Blake Jones vs Kyden Reeh / Stan Rodgers6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJose Gonzalez / Timothy Grailer vs Jon Cooper / Javier Cordero2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-30vs Cantey/Bentonville/KTCWon 20
W#2 DoublesTimothy Grailer / Jose Gonzalez vs Hershel Blevins / Tong-Sing Puang6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Best / Ryan Bell vs Kam Lam / Miguel Contreras6-2, 6-0
2025-09-28vs Heien-Cooper/Fayetteville/SRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMax Garcia / Vijay Manoharan vs David Sam / Clay Galloway6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMark Hendricks / Matthew Best vs Stan Rodgers / Kyden Reeh3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Grailer / Austin Lasater vs Jean-Francois Meullenet / Jon Cooper2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Max Bachman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Mark Hendricks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Austin Lasater
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Matthew Best
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Vijay Manoharan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Timothy Grailer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Ryan Bell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Best + Ryan Bell3450% games+1.3% vs expected
Matthew Best + Mark Hendricks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max Bachman
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Mark Hendricks
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
4
Austin Lasater
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Matthew Best
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Vijay Manoharan
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Timothy Grailer
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ryan Bell
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.