← Teams

SAC-Gatzke

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Juan Li
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.12
Kristin Spear
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
—
Kaelin Teo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.31
Lily Looi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.19
Cathy Gatzke
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-06-29Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAmiee Moyers / Juan Li vs Diana Callaway / Peg McClendon6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTimothea Barnatan vs Deb Garris6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Rundle / Andrea Yao vs Saskia Lippy / Courtney Pierce2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-06-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJuan Li / Amiee Moyers vs Julie Hester / Kristi Vargas6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Jalaja Uppili vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Lisa West6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKristin Spear vs Ann Skoog6-0, 6-0
2019-06-08Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesAmiee Moyers / Juan Li vs Elizabeth Casimiro / Jennifer Yoken6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCathy Gatzke vs Rebecca Jones6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJalaja Uppili / Lily Looi vs Judith Kobin / Claire Thayer6-0, 6-2
2019-06-07Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesTao Hua / Kaelin Teo vs Lisa Handley / Nikki Metcalf3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Spear vs Michele Gray7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAmiee Moyers / Juan Li vs Heidi Clark / Linda Lovett6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Shannon Neal vs Kim Stevens / Sally Sterling6-2, 6-3
2019-06-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTao Hua / Kaelin Teo vs Nenette Olson / Liz DelPlato6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuan Li / Amiee Moyers vs Rise Hawley / Kari Martin5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Jalaja Uppili vs Penny Birkhofer / Katherine Kralj6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2019-05-18Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAmiee Moyers / Juan Li vs Amy Jean / Marie Picard6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaelin Teo / Tao Hua vs Carrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTimothea Barnatan vs Kristen Benkstein6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Jalaja Uppili vs Joelle Lewis / Rochelle Hart2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-04-28Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesJuan Li / Amiee Moyers vs Sue Edmonds / Theresa Berry6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTao Hua / Kaelin Teo vs Jennifer Andrieu / Suzy Rylander6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristin Spear vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Laura Rundle vs Kelley Gaylor / Carrie Willis6-3, 7-6
2019-04-19Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesTao Hua / Kaelin Teo vs Carrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristin Spear vs Aracelia Hettle6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAmiee Moyers / Juan Li vs Kirsten Giacomini / Brandy Horwitz6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Gatzke / Jalaja Uppili vs Rochelle Hart / Jennifer Pancoast7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Juan Li
117W–72L career
1%98%1%
4.21
4.5
Kristin Spear
110W–39L career
3%97%0%
4.12
4
Kaelin Teo
55W–38L career
not enough data
—
4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
4
Lily Looi
77W–80L career
85%15%0%
3.31
3.5
Cathy Gatzke
53W–92L career
2%98%0%
3.19

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.