Teams

Basta/Janik CFCC

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 4.0 Men 18 & Over

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs CarrollLost 02
L#2 SinglesJohannes Haasbroek vs Zachary Manfredi3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNick Basta vs John Chapman0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs David McCabe6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesChris Hoenig vs Michael Martorelli2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNick Basta vs Maverick Maready7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-18vs Niggebrugge/PerezLost 03
L#1 SinglesTim Rahauser vs Guilherme Perez0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJohannes Haasbroek vs Mike O'Beirne2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Jordan Niggebrugge2-6, 5-7
2026-02-11vs WeddleWon 30
W#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Adam Pflaumer6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJohannes Haasbroek vs Elijah Warren7-6, 7-5
W#3 SinglesTim Rahauser vs Keith Thomas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-01-31vs CarrollLost 02
L#2 SinglesTim Rahauser vs Joshua Kleinstuber3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesNick Basta vs David Kimbrough2-6, 2-6
2026-01-26vs Niggebrugge/PerezLost 02
L#1 SinglesNick Basta vs Samuel Durham0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChris Hoenig vs Laurence Nadeau1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Bryan McCabe6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJohannes Haasbroek vs Michael Martorelli1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesTim Rahauser vs Robert Matthews4-6, 6-7
2026-01-17vs WeddleLost 02
L#1 SinglesJohannes Haasbroek vs Matej Polomsky7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNick Basta vs Christopher Soule4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0 Men 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Niggebrugge/Perez6217715148
2McCabe/Martorelli/Matthews 18+ Singles44101432248
3Carroll35121226202
4Basta/Janik CFCC2671737255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Matthew Janik
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.75
Tim Rahauser
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.73
Johannes Haasbroek
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.67
Chris Hoenig
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.35
Nick Basta
usually #3 Singles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Janik + Nick Basta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Janik
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Tim Rahauser
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Johannes Haasbroek
32W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Chris Hoenig
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Nick Basta
32W–50L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.