Teams

KWankhedkar/MWatson (Jeff Adams)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs MMackvick (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Jo Mastrangelo / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Brantley Alvey / Ashleigh Herlocker6-7, 2-6
2025-09-22vs MBradle (Sardis)Won 10
W#1 DoublesYesol Kwon / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Jessica Gaudino / Deborah Smith-Shaw7-6, 6-4
2025-09-15vs MMackvick (Carmel)Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Reel / Kashmira Wankhedkar vs Blair Beason / Ashleigh Herlocker6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Galvin / Margaret Putnam vs Lindsey Eich / Brantley Alvey6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Baughan / Sarah Edwards vs Ashley Lang / Jordan Reardon6-1, 6-2
2025-08-25vs MMackvick (Carmel)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Jo Mastrangelo / Margaret Putnam vs Lindsey Eich / Lauren Parks3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-21vs MBradle (Sardis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesYesol Kwon / Mayleng Waston vs Christina Drogaris / Lory Cobb6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Jo Mastrangelo / Sarah Edwards vs Courtney Lewis / Christy Walenczyk7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-20vs MBradle (Sardis)Won 20
W#1 DoublesYesol Kwon / Mayleng Waston vs Jessica Gaudino / Andrea Johnson6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLinda Jo Mastrangelo / Sarah Edwards vs Lory Cobb / Christy Walenczyk6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Yesol Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.56
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Laura Baughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Suzanne Galvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Kashmira Wankhedkar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Emily Reel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Margaret Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Haley Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Putnam + Kashmira Wankhedkar134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yesol Kwon
61W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
2.5
Linda Jo Mastrangelo
23W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Laura Baughan
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Suzanne Galvin
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Kashmira Wankhedkar
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Emily Reel
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Margaret Putnam
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Haley Tran
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.