Teams

AGudin/ADonathan (Life Time)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-05-09vs MQuirk/EDonohue (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Bowles / Joelle Surprenant vs Robin Caruso / Meritt Schoening4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDagmar Dohmen / Kelly Ellis vs Liz Hamilton / Janet Locke6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-02vs AStein (Ballantyne CC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAshley Bowles / Dagmar Dohmen vs Anne Bradford / Angie Brogdon2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJoelle Surprenant vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-02vs SPierle (Weddington)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAshley Bowles / Joelle Surprenant vs Janet Garvey / Terri Kimner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Anne Gudin vs Karen Carroll / Barb Marthinsen1-6, 1-6
2022-04-25vs JAdams (OPRC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Ashley Bowles vs Merrill McCreary / Kelly Warren6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Donathan / Kathleen Ciminelli vs Veronica Schaeffer / Erin Lentz4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-11vs DToomey (OPRC)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Gudin / Angela Donathan vs Christi Hart / Elizabeth Hall1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Pacello / Kelly Ellis vs Mary Kay Deering / Gabi Gorelick0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Bowles / Joelle Surprenant vs Valorie Ake / Kathleen Kullick1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-04vs MOlsen (Blakeney)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Ellis / Lisa Pacello vs Paula Drake / Julie Jenkins2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKacey Kopley / Joelle Surprenant vs Laurie Canata / Mary Shea5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Bowles / Dagmar Dohmen vs Donna DePollo / DIANE HORNER6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-28vs TFunderburk (Weddington)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Bowles / Lisa Pacello vs Margaret Dobeck / Tricia Williams3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Ciminelli / Angela Donathan vs Susan Wright / Margot Dorsel4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoelle Surprenant / Tammy Ramsay vs Anita Corum / Emily Brandon6-1, 6-4
2022-03-21vs CSheeler (Firethorne)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Bowles / Dagmar Dohmen vs Roxanne Kastein / HEATHER PHELPS6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJoelle Surprenant vs Jamie Thomas3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Ramsay / Julie Gieker vs Allison Mitchell / Christy Lovette2-6, 0-6
2022-03-07vs TBasinger (CSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Bowles / Dagmar Dohmen vs Tiffany Hurrell / Joe-Anne Saldarini2-6, 3-6
2022-02-28vs MShuford (OPRC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Gudin / Angela Donathan vs Kate Wagner / Tara Croom6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDagmar Dohmen / Ashley Bowles vs Meg Boyles / Chantal Powers6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJulie Gieker / Kacey Kopley vs Amy Esterhay / Cheryl Jensen7-5, 6-4
2022-02-21vs KDaniels-Lynch (Chestnut Square)Split 11
L#2 DoublesLisa Pacello / Kathleen Ciminelli vs Lisa Hill / Heather Hiteshew1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJoelle Surprenant vs Alison Stevons7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Dagmar Dohmen
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Ashley Bowles
published 4
3.65
Hila Johnson
published 4
3.47
Kelly Ellis
published
3.46
Lisa Pacello
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.28
Joelle Surprenant
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.28
April Porter
published 3.5
Angela Donathan
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Anne Gudin
published 3.5
3.23
Julie Gieker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Diane Hunter
published
Kacey Kopley
published
Kathleen Ciminelli
published
Priscilla Navarrete
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joelle Surprenant + Angela Donathan134 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Bowles + Joelle Surprenant123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dagmar Dohmen
17W–9L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ashley Bowles
26W–19L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Hila Johnson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Kelly Ellis
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Lisa Pacello
87W–40L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Joelle Surprenant
71W–103L career · 8 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.28
3.5
April Porter
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Angela Donathan
85W–52L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anne Gudin
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Julie Gieker
52W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Diane Hunter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kacey Kopley
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Ciminelli
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Priscilla Navarrete
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.