Teams

Stuart/Memphis

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Memphis · 4.0 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Alfonso/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Julie Ford / Luz Scallion4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLil Rudd / Ashley Wallace vs SUSAN WOODMAN / Barb Lansky6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCathy Sumrall / Jennifer Magee vs Rachel Rieves / Courtney Wright5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-26vs Eddy/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Vonya Day / Carolyn Monistere6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebbie Walker-Hulette / Lori Fairless vs Jennifer OConnell / Sheila Carro6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Bran / Marla Goodwin vs Alison Drago / Dawn Ton6-1, 7-5
2026-04-19vs Ansbro/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesVivian Gresham / Kimberly Laschober vs Lu Schneider / Katharine Schuler1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Silvia Hecht0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLil Rudd / Ashley Wallace vs Susan Ogg / Shannon Seay3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-12vs Martin/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Ally Boggan / Cindy Miller7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bran / Marla Goodwin vs Stacey Hyde / Laura Hollis-Talley2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Wallace / Kimberly Laschober vs Kristi Sides / Jennifer Wright1-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs Ansbro/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLil Rudd / Ashley Wallace vs Deana Templeton / Silvia Hecht6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDebbie Walker-Hulette / Kimberly Laschober vs Jenny Branston / Susan Ogg2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Dee Pitawanakwat / Katharine Schuler6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-22vs Eddy/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesLynn Stuart / Debbie Walker-Hulette vs Kristy Pelt / Marnie Denman7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Magee / Cathy Sumrall vs Carolyn Monistere / Beth McKnight6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLesley Grubbs / Dianna Ptacek vs Sheila Carro / Diane Brower6-4, 6-1
2026-03-08vs Alfonso/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Laschober / Vivian Gresham vs Luz Scallion / Julie Ford7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Stuart / Lesley Grubbs vs Rebecca Conrad / SUSAN WOODMAN6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Magee / Debbie Walker-Hulette vs Patricia Alfonso / Stacey Dunevant6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-03-01vs Higgins/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Stuart / Debbie Walker-Hulette vs Donna Coffman / Kimberly Mitchell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracie Gilmore / Lori Fairless vs Anne Higgins / Nancy Goodwin7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Laschober / Ashley Wallace vs Michele Smith / Eva Farris6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lesley Grubbs
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.76
Debbie Walker-Hulette
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Cathy Sumrall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Marla Goodwin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Lil Rudd
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Lynn Stuart
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Dianna Ptacek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Kimberly Laschober
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.47
Ashley Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.42
Elizabeth Bran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Vivian Gresham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Lori Fairless
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Tracie Gilmore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lil Rudd + Ashley Wallace3349% games+5.6% vs expected
Lynn Stuart + Lesley Grubbs12554% games−2.3% vs expected
Marla Goodwin + Elizabeth Bran4151% games−5.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lesley Grubbs
51W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Debbie Walker-Hulette
22W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Cathy Sumrall
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Marla Goodwin
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Lil Rudd
17W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lynn Stuart
16W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Dianna Ptacek
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
Kimberly Laschober
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57
4
Ashley Wallace
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Elizabeth Bran
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Vivian Gresham
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lori Fairless
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Tracie Gilmore
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.