Teams

Las Posas

2024 USTA Mixed 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Mixed 40&Over 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-07vs V-LLW Mixed Troubles - LondtLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Levy-Mehrali / Brent Wakatsuki vs Linda Benoit Reigel / John Valdez4-6, 3-6
2024-06-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesMark McCampbell / Angela McCampbell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrent Wakatsuki / Julie Levy-Mehrali vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-28vs Sunset HillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Levy-Mehrali / Brent Wakatsuki vs Ivette Dunlop / James Wong4-6, 2-6
2024-06-23vs Sunset HillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrent Wakatsuki / Janet Wallace vs Mia de Leon / David Spellerberg6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-01vs Pierpont Mixed 9.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesAngela McCampbell / Gary Lieb vs Alison Ferguson / Steve Debbas6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Levy-Mehrali / Brent Wakatsuki vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28vs V-LLW Mixed Troubles - LondtLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaureen Scanlon / Brent Wakatsuki vs Heather Morganson / Alex Marino2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Mixed 40&Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Valerie McKinney
published
4.34
Gary Lieb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Angela McCampbell
published 4.5
4.26
Mark McCampbell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Brent Wakatsuki
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.20
Janet Wallace
published
4.13
Julie Levy-Mehrali
published
3.92
Craig Myers
published 4
3.30
Luis Tovar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark McCampbell + Angela McCampbell5164% gamesnot enough data
Janet Wallace + Brent Wakatsuki314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Levy-Mehrali + Gary Lieb123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Valerie McKinney
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.78
4.5
Gary Lieb
77W–49L career · 1 line in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
Angela McCampbell
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.30
4.5
Mark McCampbell
43W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Brent Wakatsuki
107W–112L career · 7 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
4.20
Janet Wallace
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
4.20
Julie Levy-Mehrali
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
4
Craig Myers
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Luis Tovar
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.