Teams

LOS GATOS SR 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 2.96 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Ellie Gholami
published 3.5
3.17
Amy Beth Hansman
published 3.5
3.00
Linda Panoutsos
published
2.97
Lauren Kutting
published
2.89
Julie Schwarz
published
2.89
Ko-Yun Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Alexandra Koseva
published 3
2.83
Destiny Ortega
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Erin Maslaney
published 3
2.78
Michelle Yoo
published
2.78
Katya Yanovich
published
Ashley Pass
published 3
Chandra Khan
published 3
2.68
Elizabeth Narwal
published 3
2.66
Sharon Elder
published
2.54
Michele Stefan
published
2.52
Aviva Garrett
published 3
2.36
Adriana de Anda
published 2.5
2.32
Angelina Mullen
published 2.5
2.24
Nancy Hembree
published
2.21
Shelly Demko
published
2.00
Andrea Peifer
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Panoutsos + Sharon Elder4156% games+3.9% vs expected
Erin Maslaney + Elizabeth Narwal4161% games−1.4% vs expected
Ellie Gholami + Julie Schwarz4255% gamesnot enough data
Adriana de Anda + Nancy Hembree033 matchesnot enough data
Michele Stefan + Destiny Ortega213 matchesnot enough data
Destiny Ortega + Shelly Demko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ellie Gholami
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Amy Beth Hansman
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Linda Panoutsos
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
Lauren Kutting
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Julie Schwarz
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Ko-Yun Chen
13W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Alexandra Koseva
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Destiny Ortega
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Erin Maslaney
9W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Michelle Yoo
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Katya Yanovich
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
3
Ashley Pass
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chandra Khan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Narwal
5W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Sharon Elder
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
2.66
Michele Stefan
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%37%63%
2.54
3
Aviva Garrett
6W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Adriana de Anda
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Angelina Mullen
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.32
Nancy Hembree
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24
Shelly Demko
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Andrea Peifer
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.