Teams

Riney - Pinehurst No. 9

2026 Sandhills Summer Singles Adult 18 & over · 2.5 Adult Women

7 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-31vs Kline - Lawn and TennisLost 02
L#2 SinglesLindsay Riney vs Julia Rivera2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesStacey Gahagan vs Yvette Sparks4-6, 3-6
2026-07-23vs McFayden - Highland Country ClubLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer G Jacobson vs Madeline McFadyen3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesStacey Gahagan vs Susanna Haley0-6, 4-6
2026-07-20vs Kline - Lawn and TennisLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristie Verrilli vs Susan Lindamood3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKimberly Maloney vs Katia Weaver2-6, 5-7
2026-06-29vs McFayden - Highland Country ClubLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristie Verrilli vs Jessica Smith2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJennifer G Jacobson vs Susanna Haley4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesStacey Gahagan vs Kenly Dine0-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs Kline - Lawn and TennisLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristie Verrilli vs Katia Weaver6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay Riney vs Alexandria Romano1-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesKimberly Maloney vs Julia Rivera6-4, 6-4
2026-06-15Won 10
W#3 SinglesJennifer G Jacobson vs Lauren Warren6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1McFayden - Highland Country Club4212613133
2Kline - Lawn and Tennis4210817146
3Riney - Pinehurst No. 91551327185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Paula Trump
published
2.43
Jennifer G Jacobson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.42
Nicole Mcmahon
published
2.33
Kimberly Maloney
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.22
Kristie Verrilli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.20
Lindsay Riney
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.14
Stacey Gahagan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Riney + Paula Trump1444% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer G Jacobson + Stacey Gahagan134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Trump
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Jennifer G Jacobson
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Nicole Mcmahon
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%71%29%
2.42
Kimberly Maloney
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Kristie Verrilli
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Lindsay Riney
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Stacey Gahagan
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.