← Teams

MAC-Leedy/Davis

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Nina Sanna
published 3.5
3.20
Rico McIver
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Peg McClendon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Laney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Barbra Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Carol Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKim Wright / Rico McIver vs Cathleen Lang / Kieu Lam1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanae Pyle vs Ericka Nelson6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarol Robertson / Barbra Jorgensen vs Sarah Larson / Shannon Chen6-3, 7-6
2022-05-21Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesRico McIver / Peg McClendon vs Lisa Fogg / Carri Schmidt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarol Robertson / Deb Garris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-14Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Robin Fernstrom / Mary Marsh6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Jian Xu / Lyann Nguyen6-2, 6-0
2022-05-08Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLaura Laney / Peg McClendon vs Theresa Fichter / Jeny Joseph6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJanae Pyle / Kim Wright vs Kayla Casebeer / Bin He7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-30Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Barbara Hart / Leslie Lynch4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCarol Robertson vs Amie Manske7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Rico McIver vs Tara Baumann / Marianne Conroy6-0, 6-3
2022-04-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Della Shanley vs Terri Gotcher / Kim Hasle6-0, 6-2
L#1 SinglesGretchen Wagner vs Michelle Doherty6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Janae Pyle vs Lee Rahr / Susan Torch6-3, 6-4
2022-04-16Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesJanae Pyle vs Beth Ruff6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Wright / Laura Laney vs Kathi Gray / Janet Hostetler6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBarbra Jorgensen / Carol Robertson vs Karen Groenweghe / Patricia Sturr6-4, 6-3
2022-04-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Elise D Harvey / Gretchen Newcomb6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Laney / Peg McClendon vs Kieu Lam / Maya Mori7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBarbra Jorgensen / Gretchen Wagner vs Jean Zuber Marshburn / Thu Truong4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Nina Sanna
13W–39L career · type S
10%86%4%
3.23
3.5
Rico McIver
44W–33L career
8%91%1%
3.20
3.5
Peg McClendon
54W–53L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Laura Laney
59W–48L career
22%78%0%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Barbra Jorgensen
20W–30L career
2%92%7%
2.83
3
Carol Robertson
15W–33L career
2%96%1%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.