Teams

Lunsford/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-17vs Ybos/MemphisLost 14
L#1 DoublesLauren Cunningham / Breeana Crouch vs Emily Green / Ashley Akil6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatalie Souder vs Allison Demilio1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKyle Denney / Natalie McLean vs Theresa Carayiannis / Tindall Stephens4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLyndsay Gronostaj vs Stacy High6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLauren Heard / Amy Smythe vs Carrie Ybos / Gail Gray5-7, 5-7
2024-10-06vs Picha/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesMaria Foley / Kyle Denney vs Sandra Horn / Melissa Hurt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSusie Smith vs Christine Mendoza1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Cunningham / Amy Smythe vs Jo Picha / Lisa Rucker0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJean Phebus vs Carrie Moore6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Heard / Katie Gronostaj vs Camille Stump / Ellen Skinner6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Kyle Denney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Lauren Heard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Ashley Lunsford
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.99
Breeana Crouch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Maria Foley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lauren Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Jean Phebus
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.84
Natalie Souder
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Natalie McLean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lyndsay Gronostaj
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.48
Katie Gronostaj
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.43
Amy Smythe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Susie Smith
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsay Gronostaj + Ashley Lunsford4646% games−0.2% vs expected
Jean Phebus + Lauren Heard314 matchesnot enough data
Amy Smythe + Lyndsay Gronostaj033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Smythe + Maria Foley213 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Denney + Natalie Souder033 matchesnot enough data
Breeana Crouch + Natalie Souder213 matchesnot enough data
Breeana Crouch + Lauren Heard213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Lunsford + Natalie Souder033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Denney
14W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Lauren Heard
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Ashley Lunsford
33W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Breeana Crouch
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Maria Foley
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Lauren Cunningham
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jean Phebus
18W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Natalie Souder
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Natalie McLean
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Lyndsay Gronostaj
23W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Katie Gronostaj
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amy Smythe
16W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
Susie Smith
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.