Teams

WRAC-Cusick

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-06vs YTC-ChillinDeGrasseWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarlos Lacayo / Brad Sourbeer vs Danny Mullins / David Whiteside6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTom Rechtin / Jim Kellogg vs James Degrasse / Ron Hartley6-3, 7-6
2022-11-06vs EW-PTC-AnegonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlos Lacayo / Brad Sourbeer vs Anthony Anegon / John Lauck0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStewart Cusick / Bill Harper vs Alan Johnson / Revell Coy5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJim Kellogg / Tom Rechtin vs Jorge Pacheco / Daniel Higgins1-6, 1-6
2022-11-05vs CBRC-QAFOKULost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Kellogg / Tom Rechtin vs John Sands / Sydney Koegler3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarlos Lacayo / Stephen Knox vs Vincent Beasley / Emmitt Jackson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBill Harper / Stewart Cusick vs Nikolla Qafoku / Todd Samuel6-7, 4-6
2022-11-05vs EW-WCCP-RicheyLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarlos Lacayo / Stephen Knox vs Chris Ryan / Richard Splichal3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Sourbeer / Tom Rechtin vs Michael Ross / Kevin Kuhlmann6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStewart Cusick / Bill Harper vs Dean Gray / Tony Rund4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WCCP-Richey40938112
2EW-PTC-Anegon3193681
3CBRC-QAFOKU226612105
4WRAC-Cusick134817125
5YTC-ChillinDeGrasse0421020132

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill Harper
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carlos Lacayo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brad Sourbeer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Jim Kellogg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Richard Dix
published
Stephen Knox
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Stewart Cusick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tom Rechtin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stewart Cusick + Stephen Knox2350% gamesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Jim Kellogg3247% gamesnot enough data
Stewart Cusick + Bill Harper033 matchesnot enough data
Tom Rechtin + Stephen Knox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bill Harper
1W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carlos Lacayo
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Brad Sourbeer
3W–9L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Kellogg
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Dix
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Knox
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Stewart Cusick
8W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tom Rechtin
12W–16L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.