Teams

BC-SouthEnd/CarlosCruz-Aedo

2021 SCTA DOUBLES - Beach Cities · BC Men - 5.0 +

12 players · average NTRP 4.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-21vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/KevinGriffinLost 01
L#1 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Tracy Hyman vs Kevin Griffin / Evan Han3-6, 4-6
2021-11-06Won 10
W#2 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Tracy Hyman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-30vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/KevinGriffinLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarlos Cruz-Aedo vs Josh Hublitz4-6, 3-6
2021-10-03vs BC-LLW-MiraCosta/KevinGriffinLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarlos Cruz-Aedo / Tracy Hyman vs Brett Bacharach / Kevin Griffin2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKeith Oshiro / Steven Yau vs Christopher Dalton / Alan Shortz6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Men - 5.0 + have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Attila Lassu
published 5
4.45
Philip Evatt
published
4.36
Steven Yau
published
4.34
Evan Mobley
published 4.5
4.28
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Tracy Hyman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Keith Oshiro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jeremy Shaw
published
Pablo Barajas
published
Phil Chidester
published
Tyler Tulenko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Evatt + Tracy Hyman4257% games+4.2% vs expected
Carlos Cruz-Aedo + Tracy Hyman12956% games−5.5% vs expected
Keith Oshiro + Tracy Hyman3447% gamesnot enough data
Keith Oshiro + Carlos Cruz-Aedo213 matchesnot enough data
Evan Mobley + Carlos Cruz-Aedo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Attila Lassu
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.79
5
Ashton Politanoff
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Philip Evatt
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
4.45
Steven Yau
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Evan Mobley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%11%
4.34
4.5
Carlos Cruz-Aedo
78W–49L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Tracy Hyman
122W–76L career · 3 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Keith Oshiro
82W–79L career · 12 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jeremy Shaw
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Pablo Barajas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Phil Chidester
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tyler Tulenko
5W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.