Teams

Forest Lakes Jorgensen

2022 Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over Men · Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-06-04Won 20
W#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Mark Owen6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Rene Roy vs Randy Livermon / Tom Martinsen6-3, 6-3
2022-05-28vs AHS Welch-CATSSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Bobby Martin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBen Jorgensen / Edward Lis vs Dalin Pan / Paul Schmidt4-6, 6-7
2022-05-21Won 20
W#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Rene Roy vs Jeff Heatwole / Henry Hickman7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEd Leary vs John Goodrich6-3, 6-3
2022-05-14Split 11
L#1 DoublesRene Roy / Edward Lis vs Mark Owen / Tom Martinsen3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Jackson Evanow6-3, 6-4
2022-05-07vs AHS Welch-CATSWon 20
W#1 SinglesEd Leary vs Derek Frazier6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Rene Roy vs Tyler Chow / Patrick Manalich6-0, 6-2
2022-04-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Rene Roy vs Gavin Erskine / Paul Simko6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-23vs BHSC MartinsenSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBen Jorgensen / Edward Lis vs Tom Martinsen / Mark Owen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEd Leary vs Tim Grossman6-0, 6-2
2022-04-16vs AHS Welch-CATSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Riddle / Rene Roy vs Lorenzo Davis / Melvin Herndon4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Baker / Ed Leary vs Mark McCarron / Russell Ridings6-1, 6-2
2022-04-09vs ACAC BarrLost 02
L#2 DoublesEdward Lis / Rene Roy vs Jeff Heatwole / John Goodrich5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesEd Leary vs Jordan Barr5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
3.86
Ed Leary
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4
3.75
Ben Jorgensen
published 4
3.70
John Oliver
published
3.58
Benjamin Baker
published 4
3.55
Rene Roy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.50
Edward Lis
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
Kevin Riddle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rene Roy + Edward Lis121949% games−0.2% vs expected
Rene Roy + Benjamin Baker134 matchesnot enough data
Ben Jorgensen + Edward Lis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Henry Clifford III
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Ed Leary
131W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Ben Jorgensen
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
John Oliver
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Benjamin Baker
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Rene Roy
83W–88L career · 7 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Edward Lis
136W–133L career · 8 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
Kevin Riddle
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.