Teams

It does hurt to try

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over · Men 4.5 - 40 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 4.29 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-06vs Men's 4.5 Q Team 40 & OverWon 31
L#1 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nelson Miller vs Paul Beck - * / Scott Hanson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDick Collum vs Andrew Lenssen - *6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoshua Munro / James Stevens vs Eric Holden - * / Brian Joos7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJustin Arndt / Cary Burg vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-31vs Men's 4.5 Q Team 40 & OverWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nelson Miller vs Paul Beck / Jimmy Vroman - *6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDick Collum vs Paul Larson - *6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoshua Munro / James Stevens vs Eric Holden - * / Brian Joos6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJustin Arndt / Cary Burg vs Beau Houston - * / Christopher Dahl2-6, 2-6
2023-07-31vs Men's 4.5 Q Team 40 & OverWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohncarl Rogge / Nelson Miller vs Paul Beck / Jimmy Vroman - *3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDick Collum vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJames Stevens / Joshua Munro vs Eric Holden - * / Brian Joos7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJustin Arndt / Cary Burg vs Beau Houston - * / Christopher Dahl1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.5 - 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1It does hurt to try3012000
2Men's 4.5 Q Team 40 & Over0301224144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Johncarl Rogge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Nelson Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Joshua Munro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
James Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Dick Collum
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Justin Arndt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Cary Burg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nelson Miller + Johncarl Rogge11756% games+0.0% vs expected
Justin Arndt + Cary Burg2639% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Munro + James Stevens3444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Johncarl Rogge
36W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.30
4.5
Nelson Miller
32W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Joshua Munro
52W–72L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
James Stevens
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Dick Collum
33W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Justin Arndt
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Cary Burg
5W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.