Teams

Parris - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-18vs Worley - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrian Jordan / Kevin Groom vs Anthony Bonjorno / Rudy Seelmann0-6, 3-6
2024-04-11vs Worley - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Jordan / Russ Parris vs Jason Struck / Jerry Mosley5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-04vs Worley - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Yager / Brian Jordan vs Brett Worley / Christopher Brown6-1, 6-1
2024-03-28vs Worley - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Groom / Brian Jordan vs Bruce Caton / Christopher Brown6-0, 6-1
2024-03-21vs Worley - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesRuss Parris / Brian Jordan vs Jason Struck / Christopher Brown6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Yager / Kevin Groom vs Anthony Bonjorno / James Richardson7-6, 6-1
2024-03-14vs Worley - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Yager / Kevin Groom vs Brett Worley / Jason Struck4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Brian Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Russ Parris
published
3.75
Ali Kizilbash
published 4
3.69
Michael Yager
published
3.62
Kevin Groom
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.60
Ryan Elliott
published
3.59
Timothy Kunkel
published
3.58
Tim Falzone
published
3.47
ELBERT WOMBLE
published
3.43
Todd Ammons
published
3.32
Calvin Moore
published 3.5
Todd Fisher
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Falzone + Calvin Moore303 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Groom + Russ Parris123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Jordan
99W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.31
Russ Parris
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Ali Kizilbash
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Michael Yager
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Kevin Groom
50W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Timothy Kunkel
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.59
Tim Falzone
15W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
ELBERT WOMBLE
2W–13L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
Todd Ammons
3W–12L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Calvin Moore
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Todd Fisher
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.