Teams

Sun City Aces

Winter Adult 55 & Over Doubles · Mens 8.0 55

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-29vs Over 55 Gone to ATCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarry Tran / Harry Ozar vs Rick Fowler / John Christensen6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Williams / Mark Wallenbrock vs Tony Rankin / Christopher Swenson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMitch Pruett / John Garza vs Barry Aidman / Lyn Loeffler6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Ancient Warriors 8.0 55+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMartin Sieckmann / Steve Read vs Changsu Lee / John Ratcliff2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHarry Ozar / Harry Tran vs David Phillips / Michael Phillips4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMark Williams / Don Flora vs Bredt Norwood / David Ballard4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-03-21vs Oldies but GoodiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesBoyd Harris / Harry Tran vs Piotr Wojcik / Richard Evans6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Dwyer / Mark Williams vs Xerxes Sarkary / Scott Sheddan3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMitch Pruett / Randy Harris vs Jim Boyd / Christopher Felder6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-03-19vs River Place Blue BallersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartin Sieckmann / Steve Read vs Scott Logeman / Thomas Petrone6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHarry Tran / Don Flora vs Marcus Hafner / Steven Farrar6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBoyd Harris / Todd Williams vs George Kotlarz / David Hafner2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-28vs Over 55 Gone to ATCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarry Ozar / Harry Tran vs Lawrence Embrey / JP Jordan6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Dwyer / Mark Williams vs John Christensen / Lyn Loeffler6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSuheil Baaklini / Boyd Harris vs Rick Fowler / Russell Steele6-1, 6-0
2026-02-22vs Oldies but GoodiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarry Ozar / Harry Tran vs Xerxes Sarkary / Christopher Felder7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDon Flora / Suheil Baaklini vs Jim Boyd / Joe Kenis6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMitch Pruett / Mark Wallenbrock vs Robert Rinke / Richard Evans7-5, 6-4
2026-02-21vs Ancient Warriors 8.0 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHarry Ozar / Harry Tran vs Brian Winans / Changsu Lee4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Dwyer / Mark Williams vs Phillip Langley / John Ratcliff3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-01-31vs River Place Blue BallersWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarry Ozar / Harry Tran vs Gabriel Spitz / Thomas Petrone6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Dwyer / Boyd Harris vs Scott Holick / Kent Hunter6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMark Williams / Mark Wallenbrock vs David Hafner / Todd Rumaner6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Mens 8.0 55
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ancient Warriors 8.0 55+8021311150
2Sun City Aces5316819186
3Oldies but Goodies4381330219
4Over 55 Gone to ATC1641736237
5River Place Blue Ballers1781634230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Harry Tran
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.95
John Dwyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Harry Ozar
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.77
Don Flora
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gary Stein
published 4
3.66
Boyd Harris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
John Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Mitch Pruett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Wallenbrock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Martin Sieckmann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randy Harris
published
Steve Read
published
Suheil Baaklini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Todd Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harry Ozar + Harry Tran23166% gamesnot enough data
Gary Stein + Harry Ozar8262% gamesnot enough data
Boyd Harris + Harry Tran5260% gamesnot enough data
Gary Stein + Harry Tran314 matchesnot enough data
Boyd Harris + Mitch Pruett123 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wallenbrock + Mitch Pruett213 matchesnot enough data
Mitch Pruett + Harry Tran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Harry Tran
77W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.98
John Dwyer
66W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Harry Ozar
51W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Don Flora
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gary Stein
34W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Boyd Harris
19W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.66
John Garza
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Mitch Pruett
41W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Mark Wallenbrock
51W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Martin Sieckmann
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Harris
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve Read
27W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Suheil Baaklini
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Todd Williams
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.