Teams

Missouri City - Swing Swing

2025 HTA Spring NA - Mixed Doubles Sunday · 8.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.33 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-12vs Katy Park - OddballsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinh Do / Ghulam Jilani vs Francisco Feregrino / Maria Vazquez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas MNguyen / Victoria Tran vs Aileen Rios / Arturo Rios4-6, 6-2
2025-02-23vs Katy Park - OddballsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLinh Do / Christopher Phan vs Yamilet Castillo / Dan Smith7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGiang Dinh / Eric van Westering vs Aileen Rios / Arturo Rios2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLAN Au / Thomas MNguyen vs Maria Vazquez / Francisco Feregrino7-5, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMichael Martinez / Thai Nguyen vs Grace Best / Erick di Matteo7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Antony Leung
published 4.5
4.01
Billington Tong
published 4.5
Christopher Phan
published 4
3.68
LAN Au
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Eric van Westering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Linh Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Ghulam Jilani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Giang Dinh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Don Bae
published
3.40
Emmeline Colmenares
published
3.37
Michael Martinez
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Thomas MNguyen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Lynn Dinh
published
Thomas Nguyen
published
Victoria Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Phan + Linh Do1444% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Dinh + Thomas MNguyen404 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Nguyen + Lynn Dinh213 matchesnot enough data
LAN Au + Thomas MNguyen213 matchesnot enough data
LAN Au + Don Bae303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Antony Leung
37W–26L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4.5
Billington Tong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Christopher Phan
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
LAN Au
60W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Eric van Westering
17W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Linh Do
78W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Ghulam Jilani
30W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Giang Dinh
54W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Don Bae
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Emmeline Colmenares
53W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Michael Martinez
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.37
Thomas MNguyen
28W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
Lynn Dinh
88W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Thomas Nguyen
22W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Tran
43W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.