Teams

Winner - Veltri/Wank

2023 Broward Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-11-17vs Dillon - QuinteroWon 21
W#1 DoublesSally Guerra / Camila Giraldo vs Caprice Thomas / Tiffany Lawson6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBianca Alvarez vs Natasha Torres4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHelene Buechele / Andrea Cornelissen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-15vs Dillon - QuinteroLost 01
L#1 DoublesGricel Boto Bernales / Maria Vegas de Pardo vs Ali Quintero / Ivet Hernandez3-6, 4-6
2022-11-03vs Dillon - QuinteroWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Guerra / Camila Giraldo vs Suzanne Mesko / Natasha Torres6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesVeronica Wank / Cindy Conine vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-06vs Dillon - QuinteroLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Vegas de Pardo / Andrea Cornelissen vs Natasha Torres / Melanie Helmer2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGricel Boto Bernales vs Ali Quintero2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Sally Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Andrea Cornelissen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.30
Cindy Conine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Camila Giraldo
published 4.5
4.16
Bianca Alvarez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Maria Vegas de Pardo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.01
Helene Buechele
published
3.79
Veronica Wank
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gricel Boto Bernales + Bianca Alvarez5554% games+7.4% vs expected
Sally Guerra + Veronica Wank6271% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Cornelissen + Sally Guerra4353% gamesnot enough data
Maria Vegas de Pardo + Cindy Conine123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sally Guerra
158W–75L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
4.38
4.5
Andrea Cornelissen
70W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Cindy Conine
115W–53L career · 1 line in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Camila Giraldo
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 1 line in 2023
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Maria Vegas de Pardo
110W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
4.10
4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–259L career · 2 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
4.09
Helene Buechele
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Veronica Wank
148W–154L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.