Teams

SHC-Campbell

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.81 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Paul Heath
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brad Socolofsky
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Anthony Valenzuela
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Clark Cosart
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.42
Daniel Heck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.41
Don Ormsby
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.31
Craig Hlady
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Troy Johnston
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-06-29Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Heck / Brad Socolofsky vs Keith Johnson / Soren Coughlin-Glaser6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Ben Merritt6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Keith Gordon7-6, 6-2
2019-06-23Split 22
L#1 DoublesDaniel Heck / Lance Campbell vs John Christiaan / Martin Jeffrey Binns6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Jono Neher6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Troy Johnston vs Min Lee / David Richardson7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCraig Hlady / Joseph Collins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-15Won 21
W#1 SinglesClark Cosart vs Sam Ko6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Alan Squires vs James Raleigh / Neerav Shah6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTroy Johnston vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-08Lost 13
L#1 SinglesClark Cosart vs Nathan Austin6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDaniel Heck / Chris Stark vs Steve Vanderploeg / Butch Dela Cruz6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Joe Warner6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrad Socolofsky / Anthony Valenzuela vs Christopher Gilmore / Donovan Oliver6-3, 6-1
2019-06-02Won 31
W#1 DoublesJoseph Collins / Daniel Heck vs Sam Ko / Arjun Bilakanti6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs William Pinelli6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesCraig Hlady vs Paritosh Saxena6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTroy Johnston / Clark Cosart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-05-18Split 11
L#2 SinglesCraig Hlady vs Clint Benson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Socolofsky / David Meisels vs Terence Gariety / Michael Maxfield6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2019-05-04Lost 13
L#1 SinglesDon Ormsby vs Rick Wong6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Paul Heath vs Christian Walkenhorst / Tim Brink6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCraig Hlady vs Zhitong Chen6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTroy Johnston / Rich Adams vs Jonathan Eames / Floyd Grant6-4, 7-6
2019-04-27Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Heck / George Heilig vs David Mittelstadt / Alex Young6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Brian Posewitz6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnthony Valenzuela / Craig Hlady vs Christopher Graham / Todd Eckelman6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Paul Heath
7W–2L career
not enough data
4
Brad Socolofsky
15W–32L career
not enough data
3.5
Anthony Valenzuela
37W–64L career
0%88%12%
3.45
4
Clark Cosart
61W–38L career
51%49%0%
3.44
3.5
Daniel Heck
12W–33L career
0%87%13%
3.42
4
Don Ormsby
21W–45L career
58%42%0%
3.41
3.5
Craig Hlady
44W–51L career
1%98%2%
3.31
3.5
Troy Johnston
55W–40L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.