Teams

King Kamehameha

2024 Mixed 18 and Over Weekends · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-17vs Team MahaloWon 20
W#1 DoublesSean Newton / Crystal Mather vs Lyle Crozier / Norine Parish6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlbert Murata / Kimberly Kurashige vs Kaipo Parish / Brandy Fujisaka6-2, 6-2
2024-03-17vs Team Nui LoaWon 30
W#1 DoublesSean Newton / Valerie Reiter vs Tony Daub / Teje Aliberti6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesROBERT LOZANO / Kimberly Kurashige vs Bob Borns / Cynthia Vezina6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRiley Saito / Angela Pike vs Brett Barnes / Julia Yates6-1, 6-1
2024-03-10vs Team MahaloWon 21
W#1 DoublesRiley Saito / Valerie Reiter vs Lyle Crozier / Brandy Fujisaka6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlbert Murata / Kimberly Kurashige vs Gary Arao / Norine Parish2-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesROBERT LOZANO / Angela Pike vs Rance Tobara / Jennifer Hiro6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-10vs Team Nui LoaWon 21
W#1 DoublesRiley Saito / Angela Pike vs Bob Borns / Carmelita Villalobos6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Roe / Valerie Reiter vs Tony Daub / Julia Yates6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesROBERT LOZANO / Crystal Mather vs Manit Pothong / Teje Aliberti1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1King Kamehameha40102661
2Team Nui Loa225716115
3Team Mahalo043919125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Albert Murata
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Charles Roe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Valerie Reiter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Kimberly Kurashige
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Angela Pike
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Crystal Mather
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Juleea Loewe Llanes
published
ROBERT LOZANO
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Riley Saito
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sean Newton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Newton + Valerie Reiter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Murata
89W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Charles Roe
63W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Valerie Reiter
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Kimberly Kurashige
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
4
Angela Pike
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Crystal Mather
17W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Juleea Loewe Llanes
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
ROBERT LOZANO
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Riley Saito
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Newton
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.