Teams

West Orange

2025 18&over Women Day Winter · 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-01-30vs NJ: Shot GirlsLost 13
L#1 DoublesLindsey Loventhal / Susan Farber vs Yuko Nishimura / Susan Lee2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLucy Forbes vs Hannah Finkelberg5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTaryn Berelowitz / Melissa Lowy vs Maya Furumoto / Keiko Chhaya3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJami Kurschner / Megeen Charvala vs Deb Murawski / Bree Choy7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smash and Dash09142246317
2NJD: Westfield 3.0 #101033719258
3Sweet Spots010291124211
4Crestmont Miss Hits010241635303
5Centercourt Racquettes010261436310
6Love and Deuces010142657410
7Westfield 3.0 #2010103062395
8West Orange01043673451

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Lindsey Loventhal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bonnie Ryan
published 3.5
Jacqualine Anderson
published 3.5
Jami Kurschner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Pranee Tonkaew
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julieta Alvarez
published
Kip Mandelbaum
published
Laura Epstein
published
Laurie Solomon
published
Lisa Pivawer
published
Lucy Forbes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Megeen Charvala
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Lowy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Pariser
published
Randi Goldstein
published
Stacey Borden
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Stacy Wayne
published
Stephanie Weinstein
published
Susan Farber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Gyves
published
Susan Walsh
published
Taryn Berelowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Ryan + Megeen Charvala2345% games−3.8% vs expected
Pamela Pariser + Randi Goldstein3256% gamesnot enough data
Lindsey Loventhal + Melissa Lowy4156% gamesnot enough data
Susan Walsh + Laura Epstein314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsey Loventhal
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Bonnie Ryan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jacqualine Anderson
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Jami Kurschner
41W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pranee Tonkaew
45W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Julieta Alvarez
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kip Mandelbaum
14W–33L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Epstein
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Solomon
12W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Pivawer
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucy Forbes
37W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Megeen Charvala
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Lowy
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Pariser
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randi Goldstein
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacey Borden
38W–48L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Wayne
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Weinstein
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Farber
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Gyves
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Walsh
28W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Taryn Berelowitz
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.