Teams

Broome/Nashville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over - Nashville · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-25vs Buhalis/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Lahey / Sunyoung Fitt vs Ginger Childs / Kelly Cole6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCammy Arney / Nina Tateuchi vs Kim Blakley / Kim Miles4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Mahoney / Leah Wilson vs Christy Briggs / Kim Thompson2-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Comegna/NashvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Bennie / Katherine Davis vs Colleen Andrews / Mary Powers2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Sara Cook / Missy Eisenhauer vs Brandi White / Judith Gallagher6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Mahoney / Sarah Fowler vs Dina Sjursen / Carolyn Slandzicki7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women - Wednesday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sunyoung Fitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kelly Bennie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Missy Eisenhauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Rebecca Sara Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Susan Lahey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jessica Lester
published
3.16
Kristi Broome
published
3.11
Nina Tateuchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Heidi Kaye
published
2.95
Deidra Young
published 3
2.88
Cammy Arney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Mary Craft
published
2.86
Shelly Wade
published
Linh Burnett
published
Mary Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Missy Eisenhauer + Nina Tateuchi4256% games+2.7% vs expected
Susan Lahey + Rebecca Sara Cook1544% games+0.1% vs expected
Kelly Bennie + Sunyoung Fitt314 matchesnot enough data
Sunyoung Fitt + Susan Lahey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sunyoung Fitt
14W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kelly Bennie
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Missy Eisenhauer
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Rebecca Sara Cook
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Susan Lahey
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Jessica Lester
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.16
Kristi Broome
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Nina Tateuchi
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Heidi Kaye
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Deidra Young
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Cammy Arney
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.88
Mary Craft
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Shelly Wade
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Linh Burnett
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Mahoney
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.