Teams

Team Vamos

2026 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA League · Mens 4.5 Flight

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-30vs Dirty Mike & The BoysLost 01
L#1 SinglesRobert Sandate vs Julius Cortez4-6, 2-6
2026-05-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRobert Sandate vs Ben Jackson2-6, 5-7
2026-05-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRobert Sandate vs Juan Rios1-6, 1-6
2026-04-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRobert Sandate vs Oscar Martinez1-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs Hit and RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesWolfgang Lopez vs Juan Rios0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Ferrand / Robert Sandate vs Dan McBurney / Reno Vega2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-26vs Hit and RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesWolfgang Lopez vs Juan Rios2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Sandate vs James Storbeck2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 4.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Carlos Vega
usually #1 Doubles 93%, also #2 Doubles 7% · published 4
3.84
Miguel Valdez
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.83
David Aguilar
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.82
Johnny Chapa
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.76
Robert Sandate
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.74
Daniel Ferrand
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.72
Wolfgang Lopez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kevin Dupont
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Aguilar + Johnny Chapa404 matchesnot enough data
David Aguilar + Miguel Valdez314 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Vega + Johnny Chapa314 matchesnot enough data
David Aguilar + Carlos Vega123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Ferrand + Johnny Chapa213 matchesnot enough data
Johnny Chapa + Miguel Valdez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carlos Vega
19W–20L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Miguel Valdez
18W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
David Aguilar
19W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Johnny Chapa
18W–6L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Robert Sandate
15W–23L career · 12 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Daniel Ferrand
11W–19L career · 10 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Wolfgang Lopez
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kevin Dupont
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.