Teams

MacAttack 3.5 18+

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule15 played
2021-06-18vs Oaksmith 3.5 18+Won 20
W#2 SinglesCora Ho vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Loan Nguyen vs Stephanie Ruskin / Kathryn Broadbent6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-14vs Sets In The CitySplit 11
W#2 DoublesSherri Capurso / Esther Wang vs Kimberly Ford / Stephanie Freeman6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesCora Ho vs Karin Davis3-6, 7-6
2021-06-12vs Casual SetsLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Debra MacDonald vs Elizabeth Goldy / Amy LaMoure5-7, 4-6
2021-06-09vs Will Play for Chardonnay 3.5 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Rhee / Laura Haney vs Gail Poole-Vaughn / Ilene Fishkind6-1, 7-5
2021-06-05vs Vitamin TWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennie Kim / Evelyn Chan vs Nicole Connell / Tina Sarfaraz6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCora Ho vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Rebecca Stewart vs Leslie Mansfield / Katie Wolven6-1, 6-1
2021-05-22vs Rally Girls 3.5 18+Split 11
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs Faustina Smith-Neil1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs TRINA CUNNINGHAM / Karin Johansen4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-19vs Masked MavensLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs Lynne Ensor1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCora Ho vs Jordan Poehler2-6, 6-7
2021-05-16vs SegristLost 12
L#2 DoublesCora Ho / Laura Haney vs Maggie Christian / Suzanne Arena6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKaren Spano vs Valerie Hicks3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLoan Nguyen / Sherri Capurso vs Cindy Wright / Mary Bielefeld6-1, 6-1
2021-05-12vs Vitamin TSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKaren Spano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Sarah Speirs vs Shelly Chamness / Terri Bradford6-7, 6-7
2021-05-05vs Sets In The CitySplit 11
L#1 SinglesCora Ho vs Alisa Atkins1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSherri Capurso / Sarah Speirs vs Maggie Johnson / Shelley Sturtz6-3, 6-0
2021-05-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Capurso / Debra MacDonald vs Megan Wilhelm / STACEY WOLFE6-0, 6-0
2021-05-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesSarah Speirs / Debra MacDonald vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-20vs Will Play for Chardonnay 3.5 18+Won 21
L#1 SinglesJennie Kim vs Ann Conklin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCora Ho / Sherri Capurso vs Sanghee Lee / Ilene Fishkind7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKaren Spano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-16vs Casual SetsWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaren Spano vs Jessica Dixon Laukzemis6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Susan Rhee vs Elizabeth Goldy / Maria del Mar Landron6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-06vs Masked MavensWon 30
W#1 SinglesCora Ho vs Katie Young6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSherri Capurso / Jennie Kim vs Marian Boring / Dana Simpler6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Debra MacDonald vs Debbie Drown / Susan Reichard6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.42
Rebecca Stewart
published
3.41
Sherri Capurso
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.28
Cora Ho
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
3.28
Sarah Speirs
published
3.15
Angela Lee
published 3.5
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.88
Karen Spano
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Loan Nguyen
published
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + Debra MacDonald241455% games−2.3% vs expected
Karen Spano + Debra MacDonald2551% gamesnot enough data
Sherri Capurso + Cora Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Kim + Cora Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Sherri Capurso + Jennie Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
Rebecca Stewart
36W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Sherri Capurso
86W–56L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Jennie Kim
266W–126L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Sarah Speirs
33W–12L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Angela Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
Loan Nguyen
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.