Teams

Lubbock

2025 18 & Over Little State · Men's 4.5 Flight

7 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-17vs San Antonio-BanditsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoe Alvarez / Ian McDonald vs Saurabh Gupta / Luke Danielson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJack Williams / Robert Chon Garcia vs Peter Trang / Chris Robinson7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Henderson / Reese Cook vs George Brothers / Huntington Snell6-2, 6-1
2025-08-16vs Corpus-Big BackhandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMel McRee / Ian McDonald vs Juan Rios / James Storbeck6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJack Williams / Matthew Henderson vs Reno Vega / Robert Sandate6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Chon Garcia / Reese Cook vs Angel Rios / Nicholas Loveland6-0, 6-0
2025-08-15vs Corpus-Big BackhandsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMel McRee / Ian McDonald vs Angel Rios / Jesus Rios6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesReese Cook / Jack Williams vs Juan Rios / James Storbeck6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMatthew Henderson / Robert Chon Garcia vs Nicholas Loveland / Reno Vega6-3, 6-2
2025-08-15vs San Antonio-BanditsWon 30
W#1 DoublesReese Cook / Ian McDonald vs George Brothers / Huntington Snell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Henderson / Robert Chon Garcia vs Luke Danielson / Shaun Hicks7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Williams / Joe Alvarez vs Chris Robinson / Peter Trang6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Jack Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.42
Mel McRee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.20
Ian McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Robert Chon Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Joe Alvarez
published
Matthew Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Reese Cook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Williams
21W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
Mel McRee
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
4.42
Ian McDonald
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Robert Chon Garcia
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
4.17
Joe Alvarez
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Henderson
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reese Cook
11W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.