Teams

Burt/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-14vs Bennett/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Carlisle / Sarah Haygood vs Ragan Washburn / Ana Yambrek0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMartha Robertson vs Alison Rice3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBradley Fogelman / Kathleen Uhlhorn vs Finy Shirley / Katie Savage6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAlexandra Roll vs Suzanne Sexton2-0
W#3 DoublesPalmer Burt / Jessica Roberson vs Kristen Griffith / Leigh Ann Wills6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-07vs Goetsch/MemphisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPalmer Burt / Jennifer Keras vs Anita Kang / Teresa Goetsch2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMartha Robertson vs Penny Martin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lovell / Sarah Haygood vs Randi Mullaney / Jennifer Holland2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica Roberson / Alexandra Roll vs Terri Smith / Hollie Federman4-6, 1-6
2024-10-31vs Haynes/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesKathleen Uhlhorn / Madison Cowherd vs Hayley Hudson / Carley Myrick6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesPalmer Burt vs Kristen Alexander4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Roberson / Jean Johnston vs Shannon Finks / Lori Jones2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBradley Fogelman / Jennifer Keras vs Sally Haynes / MeriTaylor Kurdelmeyer3-6, 2-6
2024-10-29vs Martin/MemphisWon 41
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lovell / Madison Cowherd vs Missy Gulick / Sonia Castany6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMartha Robertson vs Beth McKnight6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Haygood / Victoria Nelson vs Maryann Shilling / SUSAN WOODMAN1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJessica Roberson vs Tiffany Knighton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Roll / Jennifer Keras vs Gwen Basinger / Beverly Finnell5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-17vs Reddoch/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesRuth Garrett / Emily Heflin vs Jeanne Hollis / Courtney Downs3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesPalmer Burt vs Whitney Bricken6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBradley Fogelman / Sarah Haygood vs Lisa Holt / Wendy Ansbro4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJessica Roberson vs Anne Fairey5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMaggie Lovell / Elizabeth Carlisle vs Jeannie Tabor / Paige Proctor1-6, 2-6
2024-10-03vs Collins/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJessica Roberson / Jennifer Keras vs Adrianne Tillmanns / Katy Hottinger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Haygood / Maggie Lovell vs Carolyn Santos / Christine Woods5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMartha Robertson vs Eleanore Maynard6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPalmer Burt / Alexandra Roll vs Lissa Brink / Jennifer Hobson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Madison Cowherd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Palmer Burt
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.34
Kathleen Uhlhorn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Ruth Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Jessica Roberson
usually #1 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.25
Bradley Fogelman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Jennifer Keras
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Sarah Haygood
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
3.13
Maggie Lovell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published
2.98
Alexandra Roll
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3.5
2.97
Victoria Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Martha Robertson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Lovell + Sarah Haygood3448% games+0.9% vs expected
Bradley Fogelman + Jennifer Keras2745% games−8.1% vs expected
Sarah Haygood + Ruth Garrett213 matchesnot enough data
Bradley Fogelman + Ruth Garrett213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Madison Cowherd
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Palmer Burt
11W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Kathleen Uhlhorn
19W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Ruth Garrett
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Jessica Roberson
19W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Bradley Fogelman
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Jennifer Keras
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Sarah Haygood
18W–20L career · 8 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Maggie Lovell
17W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alexandra Roll
8W–10L career · 8 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Victoria Nelson
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.97
Martha Robertson
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.