Teams

ACP.Sinopoli

2026 CTRL Tri-Level 55 & Over · Tri-Level 55 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-22vs ACP.TerjesenLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Sarah Shelby vs Nannette Goodwin / Lynda Noga3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Graybeal / Barbara Sinopoli vs Tobi Buckley / Diane Sauer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJill Cardella / Susan Hoffman vs Louise Hutchinson / Kimberlei Gill1-6, 3-6
2026-07-08vs KF.LeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Shelby / Laura Weygandt vs Alice Schoots / Wilda Eade6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sinopoli / Carole Bobby vs Ilona Peszlen / Beth Johnson2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Hoffman / Patricia Twomey vs Sue Hackney / Kati Ray1-6, 4-6
2026-07-01vs TOC.ArneLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Laura Weygandt vs Adrianne Leinbach / Kristin Lahey6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Graybeal / Carole Bobby vs Brenda Li / Amy Barclay1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRhonda Kaspar / Susan Hoffman vs Araya Coffey / Mary Griffiths0-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs PW.StutesmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Weygandt / Sarah Shelby vs Christine Peeples / Kecia Serwin5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sinopoli / Lisa Graybeal vs June Plotkin / Meg McDevitt6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Hoffman / Patricia Twomey vs Sue Leitch / Elizabeth Eubanks6-2, 6-1
2026-06-17vs ACP.TerjesenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBarbara Sinopoli / Carole Bobby vs Diane Sauer / Tobi Buckley6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Constantino / Jill Cardella vs Louise Hutchinson / Keely Williams6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-10vs CAS.TrailWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Kasberg / Sarah Shelby vs Jennifer Kuzma / Donna Wells3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Steele / Barbara Sinopoli vs Jane Hoffman / Joanne Kearney7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Constantino / Rhonda Kaspar vs Dell Pinkston / Michiyo Pedersen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-03vs NMAC.ThioLost 03
L#1 DoublesLaura Davidson / Laura Weygandt vs Kathy Endres / Leslie Morgan3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Sinopoli / Lisa Graybeal vs Shirley Kim / Maya Ress6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Kaspar / Janet Constantino vs Audrey Hollett / Stephanie Jabusch5-7, 2-6
2026-05-20vs KF.LeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesLiz Kasberg / Sarah Shelby vs Allison Strother / Virginia Lewis7-6, 5-3
L#2 DoublesCarole Bobby / Brenda Steele vs Alice Schoots / Wilda Eade6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJill Cardella / Patricia Twomey vs Beth Johnson / Kati Ray1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Tri-Level 55 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Arne7119513172
2KF.Lee6215921199
3NMAC.Thio62141023205
4ACP.Terjesen44111329230
5CAS.Trail1771735251
6ACP.Sinopoli1771738253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Sarah Shelby
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.73
Laura Weygandt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Liz Kasberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Carole Bobby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Brenda Steele
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Barbara Sinopoli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Lisa Graybeal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.82
Rhonda Kaspar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Jill Cardella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Janet Constantino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Patricia Twomey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Kaspar + Janet Constantino151055% games+7.8% vs expected
Barbara Sinopoli + Laura Weygandt261260% games+3.4% vs expected
Liz Kasberg + Sarah Shelby4155% games+0.8% vs expected
Liz Kasberg + Barbara Sinopoli537348% games−2.3% vs expected
Carole Bobby + Laura Weygandt7165% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Twomey + Janet Constantino1638% gamesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Barbara Sinopoli2442% gamesnot enough data
Carole Bobby + Liz Kasberg3247% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Shelby
49W–30L career · 9 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Laura Weygandt
268W–126L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Liz Kasberg
187W–173L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Carole Bobby
186W–190L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Brenda Steele
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Sinopoli
165W–228L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Lisa Graybeal
46W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Rhonda Kaspar
117W–127L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jill Cardella
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Janet Constantino
116W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Patricia Twomey
79W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.