Teams

Baton Rouge - Martin

55 & Over Combo Local at State - Men · 8.5 (55 & Over) Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-01vs LA 8.5M 55 & Over (Vining)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Douglass / Mark Holliday vs Drew Meyers / Morris Belaire1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPat Ferry / James Bruno vs Danny Maggio / Boyd Snellgrove4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Donadieu / Mark Christopher vs Tom Skowronek / Patrick Dauterive6-4, 6-2
2025-11-01vs LA 8.5M 55 & Over (Vining)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMoe Hattier / Derek Stafford vs James Vining / Jason Quinlan4-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDavid McGraw / Kevin Simpson vs Drew Meyers / John Fontenot3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPat Ferry / James Bruno vs Danny Maggio / Morris Belaire3-6, 1-6
2025-11-01vs LA 8.5M 55 & Over (Vining)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPat Ferry / Kevin Simpson vs Danny Maggio / Jason Quinlan4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid McGraw / Derek Stafford vs Tom Skowronek / Timothy Ellis7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 (55 & Over) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Pat Ferry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.08
John Donadieu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
William Douglass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.98
David McGraw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
John Scalise
published
3.82
Jeff Martin
published
Daniel Adler
published 4
3.75
Derek Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
James Bruno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Kevin Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Mark Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Mark Christopher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Moe Hattier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Martin + James Bruno314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pat Ferry
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.09
John Donadieu
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
William Douglass
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
David McGraw
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
John Scalise
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.91
Jeff Martin
53W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Daniel Adler
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Derek Stafford
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
James Bruno
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Kevin Simpson
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Mark Holliday
9W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Mark Christopher
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Moe Hattier
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.