Teams

Westwood Towler

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.44 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-17vs KRA FleckSplit 11
W#2 DoublesHeather Harker / SanDee Gammon vs Rachel Piacentini / Kerri Green6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatherine Towler / Elizabeth Diller vs Kristy Seredni / Sara Winterhoff5-7, 1-6
2022-06-08vs TDC LongWon 20
W#2 SinglesSanDee Gammon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Diller / Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka vs Becky Harper / Kathleen Steiner6-3, 6-4
2022-06-03vs Burkwood JohnsonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer White / Sarah Johnson vs Lynne Read / Lynn Reeves6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSanDee Gammon vs Kim Johnson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-27vs SCC NoblesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer White / Heather Harker vs Parker Coon / Kendall Consolvo6-1, 6-3
2022-05-20vs Raintree StahlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanet Livick / Elizabeth Diller vs Amy Boschen / Megan Lloyd6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Elizabeth Diller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
SanDee Gammon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.42
Allison Woodruff
published 3.5
3.35
Jennifer White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Heather Harker
published 3.5
3.29
Elizabeth Keith
published 3.5
Barbara Copley
published 3.5
2.97
Renee Gilman
published
2.94
Barbara Bailey
published 3
Cathy Barksdale
published 3
Janet Livick
published
Louise O'Connor
published
Mary Wood
published
Sheila Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer White + SanDee Gammon4449% gamesnot enough data
Heather Harker + Elizabeth Keith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Diller
87W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
SanDee Gammon
123W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Allison Woodruff
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
Jennifer White
104W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Heather Harker
5W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Keith
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Copley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Gilman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jennifer Combs-Pokrywka
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Barbara Bailey
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cathy Barksdale
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Livick
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise O'Connor
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Wood
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Roberts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.