Teams

Harris - Lawn and Tennis 55+

2025 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.5 Senior Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-04vs Nixon - Lawn and TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Jenifir Bruno vs Cynthia Hall / Michele Santiago3-6, 4-6
2025-04-27vs McGuirt - CCNCLost 01
L#2 DoublesLori Hercules / Cassie Drexel vs Cornelia Morris / MaryBryan Morgan4-6, 3-6
2025-04-13vs Carter - Pinehurst ResortLost 02
L#2 DoublesCassie Drexel / Lori Hercules vs Toni Davenport / Betsy Mitchel3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Kathy Maas vs Eileen Carter / Annmarie Anderson3-6, 0-6
2025-03-23vs Nixon - Lawn and TennisSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMary Howard / Lori Hercules vs Tracey Benson / Mary Bonsall6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Kathy Taylor vs Michele Santiago / Sandra Jones3-6, 1-6
2025-03-09vs Carter - Pinehurst ResortSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Maria Pope vs Carolyn Voltz / Kate Humphrey3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Maas / Lori Hercules vs Eileen Carter / Annmarie Anderson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Howard
published
3.21
Jenifir Bruno
published
3.11
Kathy Taylor
published
2.92
Kumson Karsner
published
2.73
Lori Hercules
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kathy Maas
published
Maria Pope
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Goldhammer + Lori Hercules3350% gamesnot enough data
Mary Howard + Lori Hercules3249% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Goldhammer + Mary Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Howard
49W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jenifir Bruno
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Kathy Taylor
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kumson Karsner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Lori Hercules
20W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Kathy Maas
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Pope
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.