Teams

Wendlandt/Alma/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-28vs Joslin/Bella Vista/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesMeg Canfield / Jo Beck vs Billie Joslin / Pamela Larimer2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Cox / Leigh Wendlandt vs Vickie Adkins / Marsha Taylor2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSally Simon / Maggie Griesse vs Barbara Johnson / Sandy Stursma1-6, 0-6
2024-09-28vs Roehrenbeck/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeigh Wendlandt / Maggie Griesse vs Bonnie Hartz / Carolyn Bakalekos7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Cox / Nancy Kremers vs Kathy Henson / Brenda Horne1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Rollinson / Sally Simon vs Becky Arthur / Melanie Riley3-6, 6-7
2024-09-28vs Furnish/Benton/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Griesse / Leigh Wendlandt vs Terri Luneau / Kate Hickey3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJo Beck / Meg Canfield vs Judy Furnish / Brenda Scheffler0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCathy Rollinson / Nancy Kremers vs Donna Owens / Ann Rowell0-6, 2-6
2024-09-27vs Wisdom/FS/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatricia Cox / Sally Simon vs Glenda Weigand / Judy Boreham0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Griesse / Leigh Wendlandt vs Debbie Southerland / Liza Holman6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Kremers / Cathy Rollinson vs Jeannette Falkner / Janice Wisdom6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Leigh Wendlandt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Sally Simon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Cathy Rollinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Nancy Kremers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jo Beck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Maggie Griesse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Meg Canfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Kremers + Cathy Rollinson044 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Wendlandt + Maggie Griesse404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leigh Wendlandt
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Sally Simon
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Cathy Rollinson
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Nancy Kremers
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
Jo Beck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maggie Griesse
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meg Canfield
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.