Teams

TYCC Yachty By Nature - M. Mariani

2024 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-20vs Palma Ceia Penn Pirates - E. PentoLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Mariani / Stephanie Rumbley vs Melissa Henderson / Nichole Vogt2-6, 4-6
2024-05-13vs PC Dashing Divas - J. HolbrookWon 10
W#2 DoublesLauren Green / Lindsay Davitt vs Brenda McIsaac / Christine Assefa6-3, 6-2
2024-05-06vs Buckhorn Matchmakers - C. SullivanLost 02
L#1 DoublesMargaret Mariani / Sarah Weaver vs Carlee Revoy / Erin Lobner2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLindsay Davitt vs Emily Corbett3-6, 4-6
2024-04-22vs Hills/Parmer/40&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Rumbley / Margaret Mariani vs Julie Sayer / Nicole Borel-Saladin3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Davitt / Lauren Green vs Carole Jahns / Susan Skipper1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-08vs Buckhorn Sweetspots - C. DemingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMargaret Mariani / Stephanie Rumbley vs Ginger Anzalone / Carrie Deming2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLindsay Davitt vs Melissa Wolczak6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Kathryn O'Brien
published
2.96
Lauren Green
published
2.95
Amy Hale
published 3
2.95
Lindsay Davitt
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Margaret Mariani
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Mary Beth Courier
published
2.76
Shannon Roark
published
2.73
Ali Garrity
published 3
2.68
Stephanie Rumbley
published
2.57
Sarah Weaver
published
2.56
Cyre Mooney
published 3
2.08
Molly James
published
Joelle Bertozzi
published
Megan Eakins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Green + Lindsay Davitt314 matchesnot enough data
Margaret Mariani + Stephanie Rumbley224 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Green + Amy Hale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn O'Brien
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Lauren Green
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.96
3
Amy Hale
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Lindsay Davitt
87W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Margaret Mariani
73W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
Mary Beth Courier
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Shannon Roark
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Ali Garrity
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Stephanie Rumbley
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
Sarah Weaver
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Cyre Mooney
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
Molly James
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Joelle Bertozzi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Eakins
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.