Teams

Match Makers 2.0

2026 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings6 teams · Ventura - Women 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Malibu Smokin Aces WE000000
2Fall Spirited Warriors PRC000000
3SHCC Sun & Games000000
4Ojai Pixies 4.0000000
5Royally Fun000000
6Match Makers 2.0000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Julie Perron
published
3.63
Jami Shane
published
3.62
Jill Koenig
published 4
3.62
Theresa Chase
published
3.59
Melanie Truhett
published 4
3.55
Mary Manix
published
3.55
Erin MacKie
published
3.44
Natascha Crecion
published
3.42
Bodee Lee
published 3.5
3.40
Sophia McCreary
published
3.36
Lynne F Krueger
published
3.36
Lisa Bourne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne F Krueger + Mary Manix224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Perron
10W–21L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Jami Shane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
4
Jill Koenig
97W–98L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Theresa Chase
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Melanie Truhett
125W–106L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Mary Manix
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.55
Erin MacKie
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.55
Natascha Crecion
13W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Bodee Lee
15W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Sophia McCreary
4W–14L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Lynne F Krueger
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Lisa Bourne
9W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.