Teams

Flynt/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-12vs Kinney/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLibby Flynt / Francis Mcrae vs Sarah Richardson / Candi McMorran6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Arthur vs Susanna Evalenko0-6, 1-6
2025-03-29vs Fountain/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrancis Mcrae / Melissa Pagliari vs Susan Reyna / Mimi Brumley6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTanner Baker vs Julie Lewis6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren Colpitts / Libby Flynt vs Keneisha Fountain / Deanne Helvering4-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs Cousar/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennie van Deveer / Jennifer Sanderson vs KIMBERLY JUSSELY / Jenni Harris6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLibby Flynt vs Shelby Monteverde4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMegan Arthur / Christa George vs Mary-Grace Gentry / Helene Harris6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Francis Mcrae
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Francesca Bengert
published
2.27
Tanner Baker
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.12
Jennie van Deveer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Libby Flynt
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.01
Melissa Pagliari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Christa George
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.79
Lauren Colpitts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Arthur
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Francis Mcrae + Libby Flynt123 matchesnot enough data
Libby Flynt + Lauren Colpitts033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Francis Mcrae
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Francesca Bengert
16W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.32
Tanner Baker
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Jennie van Deveer
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Libby Flynt
6W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Melissa Pagliari
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Christa George
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Lauren Colpitts
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Megan Arthur
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.